In my letter to Fay Dowker,
I explain how what is observed as the Big Bang is actually
an exchange of energy between two branes of string theory.
A control brane and a chaos brane.
I propose that Science has made a grand
mistake by using
the number line of mathematics to try and describe the universe.
For example, since the Universe is made of atoms, what can be
nothing?
Since no "thing" can be nothing, 0.0 is Science's greatest
mistake.
One solution is a new axiom of
mathematics! “ -c>∞<c+ ”
In my letter to Julian Barbour, I
propose that the KnoWell is a philosopher's LENS.
Again, I explain how Science has been lead astray by the
language of mathematics.
In my letter to Venkatraman Gopalan,
I explain how to get the 11 dimensions of string theory without
folding infinity.
However, Science must let go of Einstein’s Time~Space.
If Science breaks time into three
components, Past, Moment, Future,
the KnoWell expresses the 11 dimensions of string theory as
follows.
Past, up, down, both~3
Moment up, down, both~3
Future up, down, both~3
U~1
I~1
U is for union, and I is for individual or
the observer.
I use the up, down, both, notation to
relate to the Schrodinger cat experiment.
A better term for the quantum both state should be unknown or
undetermined.
Yet Science is too arrogant to admit that
their are limitations to the Scientific Method,
and the language of mathematics contains inherent errors like
0.0 and an infinite number of infinities.
My axiom “
-c>∞<c+ ”, reduces the infinite infinities on
the number line into a single infinity that only occurs at the
infinitesimal instant of the moment.
The only point in time where E= mc^2.
The same point where Chaos exchanges place with Control.
As the article that prompted this email
states, exclusions must be placed on theories.
Case in point is the Multi~Verse.

I understand that Science has become
Religion,
and most Scientists are locked into a reality set in stone by
Einstein's equations.
So Science is blind, and Religion is deaf.
If a Scientists does not get onto the Big
Bang gravy train, they will receive little funding.
So for a Scientists to put forth an equation that strongly
suggests we live in a Steady State Universe,
academia will not even entertain an alternative solution to the
3 degree Kelvin observation.
For example, my position that the friction
generated by the Chaos brane
exchanging place with the Control brane is the source of the
background radiation that is observed.
Taking a deep look at inflation theory
there is no mechanism to begin inflation, no mechanism to end
inflation,
and inflation requires the suspension of physical laws,
thus Big Bang theory depends on an
impossibility.
I KnoWell that one day, Scientific reality
will change, and that most likely will not occur in my lifetime.
If I BLeave Dr. Fred Partus of Bell Labs, "Science will take 269
years to understand the KnoWell".
Oh by the way, what changed my perspective
of reality on 19 Jun 1977 was my Death Experience.
"My life can be described as using the
pigments of Antiquity to etch into the canvas of Eternity."~3K
Your thoughts are most welcome,
David Noel Lynch