From: Lisa Grossman <lgrossman at
sciencenews.org>
To: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 at 02:28:04 PM EDT
Subject: Automatic reply: Black holes resolve paradoxes by destroying
quantum states
I am out of the office until Monday, May 1. I'll see your email then.
Thanks for your patience!
From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Lisa Grossman <lgrossman at sciencenews.org>
Cc: <feedback at sciencenews.org>; Gautam Satishchandran <gs2937
at princeton.edu>; Daine Danielson <daine at uchicago.edu>;
Robert Wald <rmwa at uchicago.edu>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 at 02:26:04 PM EDT
Subject: Black holes resolve paradoxes by destroying quantum states
Lisa,
In the below linked article,
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/black-hole-paradoxes-quantum-states
The article contains, "pits the rules of quantum mechanics and black holes
against each other"
A more accurate statement is, "pits the rules of quantum mechanics and
pits the rules of black holes against each other"
Modern Science makes tremendous assumptions like "The laws of physics
behave the same just inside the horizon as outside."
Instead of "the laws of physics", a more accurate statement is "the
language of mathematics".
Another in your face assumption is, "The team then guessed," .... “It must
be that there’s an effect that no one has calculated in these theories
that comes to the rescue,”
The thought experiment relies on similar assumptive logic based in
Schrödinger's cat's box, "But that’s a paradox — nothing done inside a
black hole should affect the outside. By the laws of physics, Bob should
not be able to communicate with Alice at all."
The foundation of the Big Bang theory rests in the assumption that the
cosmic background radiation is observational proof, without a possibility
of physical experiments, that the Big Bang must be true.
How would Bob and Alice interpret a clear glass with water inside?
Observationally the water in a clear glass can be empirically measured.
Bob obviously sees the glass is half empty and Alice obviously sees the
glass is half full.
Bob and Alice can argue the interpretation of the same fact in more than
one way forever and ever.
Observationally a Kelvin waveform in our Universe can be empirically
measured. Bob obviously sees the remnants of the Big Bang and Alice
obviously sees the friction emitted by chaos interchanging place with
control.
Again, Bob and Alice can argue the interpretation of the same fact in more
than one way forever and ever.
Sadly, modern scientists are all Bob's that are Big Bang Blind.
Modern scientists call Alice crazy for suggesting a Steady State Solution,
and Alice thinks that Bob had a Boltzmann's brain materialize in his
cranium.
In the below linked article,
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-universe-is-not-locally-real-and-the-physics-nobel-prize-winners-proved-it/
The Universe Is Not Locally Real, and the Physics Nobel Prize Winners
Proved It
The article header clearly states that Science has proof that objective
reality does not exist.
However; there is no possibility for passive observational
measurement. The empirical proof is a collection of observational
measurements acquired from an objective system in an objective lab that is
"real".
I present to you a thought trap that uses the infinite number of
infinities on the number line to expose a limit of what can be known.
***
Kaku Box
A scientist whom is an atheist is quick to BLeave that there are an
infinite number of universes in the multi-verse bulk.
The infinite number of Universes theory creates the probability that a
deity exists in one of the infinite number of Universes.
Since a deity may exist in one of the infinite number of Universes, this
Universe cannot be excluded from being the Universe that contains the
deity.
The instant an atheist clams that there is not a deity in any of the
infinite number of Universes, that is the moment that the atheist is
making a claim of omnipotent knowledge of the contents in the infinite
number of Universes.
***
"The Emergence of the Universe is the Precipitation of Chaos through the
Evaporation of Control." ~3K
I have derived a solution to the infinite number of infinities paradox.
A new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, that reduces the infinite
number of infinities into singular infinity.
Imagine for an instant that a M-Brane of absolute Control is interchanging
place with a M-Brane of pure Chaos.
As the two opposing M-Branes exchange place they are generating a Casimir
effect that is creating a friction which is being observed as the 3 degree
Kelvin cosmic background radiation.
The above Casimir effect is the motive force creating a plasma filament
Universe.
Using the speed of light squared from Einstein's energy equation, the
M-Brane of Chaos in a wave state is collapsing at the speed of light from
outer-space and a M-Brane of Control in a particle state is emerging at
the speed of light from inner-space.
Once science realizes their mistake in using a mathematical language that
contains an infinite number of infinities, science will see that my new
axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, strongly suggests that the
universe is in a steady state.
I have created an equation that uses the logic of Lynch, the energy of
Einstein, the force of Newton, and the sayings of Socrates to describe a
moment of time as infinite. I call the equation the KnoWell.
The next difficult step for science to take is to accept the fact that
Einstein's T for time must be broken into three components, a past, an
instant, and a future.
Einstein's equations hold true only at the infinitesimal instant of a
moment.
By breaking Einstein's T into three components and applying the three
dimensions to the structure of the KnoWell, I can express the 11
dimensions of Witten's M-Branes without folding a single infinity.
By placing a past KnoWell, an instant KnoWell, and a future KnoWell, I can
represent the 27 dimensions of Bosonic strings.
Notice the introduction of a new mathematical term located at the top left
in the above graphic. The letter F with a superscript P that is
located to the upper left of the F.
Read as, Future to the reduction of the Past.
An unexpected result of drawing the Bosonic Strings is the line that is
representing Anaximander's Apeiron.
The mathematical language's number line, -∞<0.0<∞+, with its
infinite number of infinities that Science uses to describe the Universe
suggests there are many worlds, but in reality the many worlds theory is
an artifact of mathematics.
Case in point:
1.0 can be fractionally incremented infinitely never reaching two, and 2.0
can be fractionally decremented infinitely never reaching one. The
infinitely wide gap between one and two creates the mathematical anomalies
of multi-verse and many worlds.
Science's greatest mistake is 0.0, and my new axiom replaces 0.0 with a
singular infinitesimal infinity.
Thus black hole, white holes, and the entire Universe are finite. If the
Universe is made of atoms, then no thing can be nothing.
Science is a study of the past. We are incapable of observing the instant
or the future.
Over the years, I have sent emails to those who might listen.
http://lynchphoto.com/letters
My 2007 Fay Dowker email is a good starting place.
http://lynchphoto.com/dowker
You might find my 2023 email to Christopher Fuchs interesting.
http://lynchphoto.com/fuchs
Best regards,
David Noel Lynch