From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Ethan Siegel <startswithabang at gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Berezow <alex.berezow at bigthink.com>; Michio Kaku <mkaku at aol.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2022 at 02:34:25 PM EDT
Subject: 70-year-old quantum prediction

Ethan,

Science's greatest mistake is 0.0, i.e., nothing.

The recent Big Think article, claims; something is created from nothing.
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/something-from-nothing/

So if the mathematics adds up, the theory must be true?

Science is bending over backwards to seek out solutions to fit modern cosmological observations into the Big Bang Theory. i.e, Inflation theory that suspends the known laws of physics, inflates the Universe to match cosmological observations, then magically reinstates the laws of physics yielding this Universe in a bulk of multiverses.

To convey concepts, Science has chosen the mathematical language, -∞<0.0<∞+ , that contains an infinite number of infinities, and Science is hindered by the constraints of the mathematical language's number line, -∞<0.0<∞+ , with its infinite number of infinites.

On 1 Sept 2018, I sent you an email in which I ask, "Could the language of mathematics be leading science to draw conclusions?"
Letter to Ethan Siegel

Case in point:1.0 can be fractionally incremented infinitely never reaching two, and 2.0 can be fractionally decremented infinitely never reaching one. The infinitely wide gap between one and two creates the mathematical anomalies of multi-verse and many worlds, thus both many world and multi-verse theories are mathematical anomalies.

http://www.lynchphoto.com/maudlin

Since that email, I have refined my position that the language of mathematics has trapped great minds in wormholes made of mirrors, and brilliant scientists will forever be deep down in black holes filled with rabbits.

Clearly the GOD equation can never be derived by using the number line, -∞<0.0<∞+, with its infinite number of infinities, and anyone that thinks they can resolve the infinite number of infinites on the current number line, -∞<0.0<∞+, into a singular GOD equation will forever be chasing their tail. i.e., Michio Kaku.

However: There is a solution to the infinite number of infinites problem. Science must adopt the usage of a new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, that reduces the infinite number of infinities into a singular infinity.

Looking closely at the new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, exposes a direct relationship to the Sauter–Schwinger effect. By propagating a Casimir effect over a vast scale the size of a Universe, our existence is due to a Steady State system that is exchanging a Witten's M-Brane of control with a Witten's M-Brane of chaos.

The friction generated by the exchange of control and chaos is what we observe as the cosmic background radiation.

As I detail in my email to Fay Dowker, this exchange of energies using Whitten's M-Branes.

Letter to Fay Dowker



As I describe in the Dowker email, I have created an equation that uses the logic of Lynch, the energy of Einstein, the force of Newton, and the sayings of Socrates to describe a moment of time as infinite. I call the equation the KnoWell.

A philosopher's LENS that strongly suggests, "The Emergence of the Universe is the Precipitation of Chaos through the Evaporation of Control." ~3K

Using the 27 dimensions of bosonic strings, breaking Einstein's T into a past, an instant, and a future component, the structure of the KnoWell is used to express Anaximander's apeiron.

http://www.lynchphoto.com/apeiron

In the over 2500 years since Anaximander put forth the philosophy of apeiron, not a single person, that I know of, has produced a diagram of his concept.

At the top of the KnoWell, is a singular infinity that is labeled Ein Sof who is the Infinite One from the Kabballah. BTW: The label Qu Bit can be used.

The single infinity, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, of the KnoWell is representative of Schrödinger's one mind, and the influence of the KnoWell's singular infinity in the new axiom, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, can be used to explain the following 22 concepts.

"Linguistic categories limit ~ determine cognitive categories"

Anaximander's~Apeiron
Schrodinger's~Three State Cat
Einstein's~E=mc^2
Descartes~I think therefore I am
Newton's~Action equals reaction
Hegel's~Thesis, synthesis, antithesis
Lynch's~Birth Life Death
Socrates'~All that I know is that I know nothing
Witten's~11 dimension M Theory
Standard Particle Theory~Bosons, Leptons, Quarks
Supersymmetry~AntiBosons, AntiLeptons, AntiQuarks
Bosonic String's~27 dimensions
Tesla's~3:6:9
Casimir~Effect
Dirac's~Sea of pre-particles
Sauter–Schwinger~Zero Energy
Gödel's~Incompleteness Theorems
Pascal's~Triangle -1~∞~1+
Wooden's~Ultimate L
Heisenberg's~Uncertainty Principle
Brans–Dicke~Scalar–Tensor Theory
Sapir-Whorf~“ -c>∞<c+ ”

Regards,
David Noel Lynch