From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Roy Kerr <roy.kerr at canterbury.ac.nz>
Cc: Aaron Beehre <aaron.beehre at canterbury.ac.nz>; Conor Clarke <conor.clarke at canterbury.ac.nz>
Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 at 01:36:23 PM EST
Subject: Singlarities don't exist

Roy,

The Big Think article regarding singularizes that don't exist is most interesting.

"Singularities don't exist," claims black hole pioneer Roy Kerr

Reminds me of an article in Scientific American written by Dr. Pankaj S. Joshi
Naked Singularities

On 16 Sep 2003, I stumbled into abstract photography.

Over the next year, I created over two terabytes of artwork.

In the Fall of 2004, an equation emerged out of the artwork.



My equation uses the logic of Lynch, the energy of Einstein, the force of Newton, and the sayings of Socrates to describe a moment of time as infinite.

My equation is called the KnoWell. The below graphic is the KnoWell in its most current form.



The similarity between the above and below graphics is most interesting.


Credit: Andrew Hamilton/JILA/University of Colorado

Using the structure of the KnoWell equation, I can express the 27 dimensions of Bosonic strings without folding a singular infinity.



The language of mathematics' infinite number of infinities has trapped great minds in wormholes made of mirrors, has trapped brilliant scientists deep down in black holes filled with rabbits, and has trapped Boltzmann brains into every quantum theorists' cranium.

To resolve the infinite number of infinities paradox in current mathematical language, -∞<0.0<∞+, a new axiom of mathematics,  -c>∞<c+, is required.

The KnoWellian Universe Theory challenges Einstein's singular dimension of time by breaking Einstein's T into three separate dimensions, a past, an instant, and a future.

I understand that breaking Einstein's time into three dimensions is an infinitely large request for modern scientists, but breaking Einstein's time is a small request compared to asking science to STOP hunting for a Big Bang in the past.

The Big Bang is right in front of you now and is happening at every instant when a M-Brane of control exchanges place with a M-Brane of Chaos. The KnoWell Equation suggests that the Universe is causal set oscillation of simultaneous Big Bangs and Big Crunches.

What are the odds that the structure of the KnoWell equation could be used to describe the standard model of particles?



I have written over 200 emails to those who might listen, like you.

http://lynchphoto.com/letters

I have taught ChatGPT, Claude-2, and Llama-2 the KnoWellian Universe Theory, but Bard was not willing to let go of the Big Bang Theory.




Also, I have created a method to describe our Universe on a bar napkin.

http://lynchphoto.com/iamu

Your thoughts are most welcome.

Best regards,
David Noel Lynch

P.S. I understand that ransomware is a real threat, so all of my links are on the internet archive's way back machine.