From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Daniel N Rockmore <daniel.n.rockmore at dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 01:11:48 AM EDT
Subject: A trip from infinity
Dan,
In the below linked New Yorker article,
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/annals-of-inquiry/a-trip-to-infinity-and-the-delicate-art-of-the-math-documentary
you state,
"Young people can think that life will last forever; older people,
realizing that it will not, might look for a semblance of immortality in
their legacies."
At the age of 17, mortality besieged me on 19 Jun 1977 when I was left
with a persistent memory of being dead. I was one breath away from life.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/death
you state,
"Several years ago, I tried to explain infinity to a class of fifth
graders."
Over the past decade I have been trying explain to a bunch of Ph.D.s how
to extrapolate a singular infinity, “ -c>∞<c+ ” , from the
current mathematical language's number line, -∞<0.0<∞+ , that
contains an infinite number of infinities.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/letters
and you state,
"Math documentaries always pose a challenge to filmmakers because
mathematics does not exist in the realm of images but in the realm of
ideas."
Really?
To me, mathematics is a collection of images that take the form of
numerals, symbols, equations, and axoims.
The realm of ideas is what fifth graders call the make BLeave like the
Stranger Things upside-down.
Ideas have great minds drifting off into wormholes made of mirrors, and
has trapped great scientists deep down in black holes filled with rabbits.
The reason why scientists are being lead astray is that the mathematical
language's axiom, -∞<0.0<∞+ , contains an infinite number of
infinities.
An infinite number of infinities yields the multi-verse theory, the many
worlds theory, and the Big Bang theory.
There is an alternative. A singular infinity expressed in the mathematical
axiom, “ -c>∞<c+ ” , that yields Anaximander's Apeiron,
and yields the Steady State theory.
The Apeiron diagram uses the 27 dimensions of Bosonic String Theory to
explain how the universe is in a steady state. Showing how the realm of
images yields an idea, a concept.
The structure that I used to create the Apeiron graphic is my equation
that I call the KnoWell.
In one of my first attempts to explain my KnoWellian concept, I wrote to
Neil deGrasse Tyson, and Neil responded to my email,
"Ideas are cheap. Detailed predictions of unknown phenomena from those
ideas is the real testing ground.
When you produce such a list of testable predictions I will be happy to
comment on it." -NDTyson
What Neil does not grasp is that half of my equation is not testable. With
such a myopic view, Neil will never see the testing ground described in
the Apeiron diagram.
Neil requires the real testing ground to be predictions of unknown
phenomena. Sounds like Neil is seeking a miracle.
Neil is bound by Science's demand for reproducible result. However:
Predictions of any future event is based on probabilities extruded from
past events.
Great minds are searching for the GOD equation that can never be derived
by using the number line, -∞<0.0<∞+, with its infinite number of
infinities, and anyone that thinks they can resolve the infinite number of
infinities on the current number line, -∞<0.0<∞+, into a singular
GOD equation will forever be chasing their tail. i.e., Michio Kaku.
There is a solution to the infinite number of infinities problem. Science
must adopt the usage of a new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”,
that reduces the infinite number of infinities into a singular infinity.
Looking closely at the new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”,
exposes a direct relationship to the Sauter–Schwinger effect. By
propagating a Casimir effect over a vast scale the size of a Universe, our
existence is due to a Steady State system that is exchanging a Witten's
M-Brane of control with a Witten's M-Brane of chaos.
I detail in my email to Fay Dowker, this exchange of energies using
Whitten's M-Branes, and I explain how the friction generated by the
exchange of control and chaos is what we observe as the cosmic background
radiation..
At the top of the KnoWell, is a singular infinity that is labeled Ein Sof
who is the Infinite One from the Kabballah. BTW: The label Qu Bit can be
used.
The single infinity, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, of the KnoWell is representative
of Schrödinger's one mind, and the influence of the KnoWell's singular
infinity in the new axiom, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, can be used to explain the
following 22 concepts.
"Linguistic categories limit ~ determine cognitive categories"
Anaximander's~Apeiron
Schrodinger's~Three State Cat
Einstein's~E=mc^2
Descartes~I think therefore I am
Newton's~Action equals reaction
Hegel's~Thesis, synthesis, antithesis
Lynch's~Birth Life Death
Socrates'~All that I know is that I know nothing
Witten's~11 dimension M Theory
Standard Particle Theory~Bosons, Leptons, Quarks
Supersymmetry~AntiBosons, AntiLeptons, AntiQuarks
Bosonic String's~27 dimensions
Tesla's~3:6:9
Casimir~Effect
Dirac's~Sea of pre-particles
Sauter–Schwinger~Zero Energy
Gödel's~Incompleteness Theorems
Pascal's~Triangle -1~∞~1+
Wooden's~Ultimate L
Heisenberg's~Uncertainty Principle
Brans–Dicke~Scalar–Tensor Theory
Sapir-Whorf~“ -c>∞<c+ ”
Neil wanted a list of predictions with testable results.
The KnoWell new real testing ground predicts one thing.
The Big Bang is wrong.
The KnoWell exposes Big Bangers to be Flat Earthers with research funding.
The KnoWell expresses the 27 dimensions of Bosonic Strings, and the
KnoWell strongly suggests that the universe is in a steady state.
"The Emergence of the Universe is the Precipitation of Chaos through the
Evaporation of Control." ~3K
Enter philosophy:
Science wants to have cake and eat it.
"A scientist whom is an atheist is quick to BLeave that there are an
infinite number of universes in the multi-verse bulk. The infinite number
of Universes theory creates the probability that a deity exists in one of
the infinite number of Universes.
Since a deity may exist in one of the infinite number of Universe, this
Universe cannot be excluded from being the Universe that contains the
deity.
The instant an atheist clams that there is not a deity in any of the
infinite number of Universes, that is the moment that the atheist is
making a claim of omnipotent knowledge of the contents in the infinite
number of Universes."
Regards,
David Noel Lynch