From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Michelle Thaller <michelle.thaller at nasa.gov>
Cc: Michael Shermer <mshermer at skeptic.com>; Michio Kaku <mkaku at aol.com>; Larry Silverberg <lmsilver at ncsu.edu>; Mike Disney <mike.disney at astro.cf.ac.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 at 06:15:52 PM EDT
Subject: Is there life after death?

Michelle,

In the below linked video, you state that time is a landscape, and given the correct perspective of the Universe, a person can see all of time laid out before you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipiewC3QP-k

In the same video, Michael Shermer states, and yet you cannot conceive what it is like to be dead.

Michael makes a quantum leap by speaking for every living person on Earth.

A scientist whom is an atheist is quick to BLeave that there are an infinite number of universes in the multi-verse bulk. The infinite number of Universes theory creates the probability that a deity exists in one of the infinite number of Universes.

Since a deity may exist in one of the infinite number of Universe, this Universe cannot be excluded from being the Universe that contains the deity.

The instant an atheist clams that there is not a deity in any of the infinite number of Universes, that is the moment that the atheist is making a claim of omnipotent knowledge of the contents of the infinite number of Universes. Can you say, narcissist?

Are you listening Michael?

On 18 Jun 1977, I was an atheist.

On 19 Jun 1977 I was involved in a serious auto accident that left me with a persistent memory of being dead.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/death


The death experience left me with a profound impression that there is something far greater than me at work in this Universe.

My death experience did not make me religious. However; I am spiritual.

For 26 years, I was a peace with the memory of my death. On 16 Sept 2003, I looked at the memory of my death in the reverse, and that night I stumbled into abstract photography.

Over the next year, I wrote out my thoughts layered on top of abstracts. In the Fall of 2004, an equation emerged from the artwork that uses the logic of Lynch, the energy of Einstein, the force of Newton, and the sayings of Socrates that describes a moment of time as infinite.

I call that equation the KnoWell. Below is a link to my equation, and I have attached a copy of the image to this email.

http://lynchphoto.com/avignon

At the center top of the KnoWell there is an infinity symbol. Using your imagination, you can radiate the top infinity symbol looping down around the past line, crossing the center, and looping down around the future line. Thus you have just projected throughout all of time. Tada, now you have the correct perspective to see all time before you.

I stopped watching the video after Michael made a blanket statement insulting people like me, so I have no idea what Michio Kaku said in his segment.

Over the years, Michio has made clear that he is searching for the GOD equation. If I were to speak in blanket statements like Michael, then I would say, using the current mathematical axiom, -∞<0.0<∞+, with its infinite number of infinites, science will never be able to create a GOD equation.

"Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true." ~ Niels Bohr

From the KnoWell equation, I have derived a new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”,  that reduces the infinite number of infinites on the current number line, -∞<0.0<∞+ , into a singular infinity.

In my email to Fay Dowker, I explain how to apply my new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, to answer some of the questions raised by modern cosmological observations. I use Witten's M branes to describe how the Universe can be a steady state system.
http://lynchphoto.com/dowker

"The Emergence of the Universe is the Precipitation of Chaos through the Evaporation of Control." ~3K

Because of the mathematical language, -∞<0.0<∞+ , that Science has chosen to convey concepts, Science remains blind to the KnoWell. Science is hindered by the constraints of the mathematical language's number line, -∞<0.0<∞+ , with its infinite number of infinites.

Case in point:
1.0 can be fractionally incremented infinitely never reaching two, and 2.0 can be fractionally decremented infinitely never reaching one. The infinitely wide gap between one and two creates the mathematical anomalies of multi-verse and many worlds, thus both many world and multi-verse theories are mathematical anomalies.

http://lynchphoto.com/maudlin

At the top of the KnoWell, is a singular infinity that is labeled Ein Sof who is the Infinite One from the Kabballah. BTW: The label Qu Bit can be used.

The single infinity, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, of the KnoWell is representative of Schrödinger's one mind, and the influence of the KnoWell's singular infinity in the new axiom, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, can be used to explain the following 21 concepts.

"Linguistic categories limit ~ determine cognitive categories"

Anaximander's~Apeiron
Schrodinger's~Three State Cat
Einstein's~E=mc^2
Descartes~I think therefore I am
Newton's~Action equals reaction
Hegel's~Thesis, synthesis, antithesis
Lynch's~Birth Life Death
Socrates'~All that I know is that I know nothing
Witten's~11 dimension M Theory
Standard Particle Theory~Bosons, Leptons, Quarks
Supersymmetry~AntiBosons, AntiLeptons, AntiQuarks
Bosonic String's~27 dimensions
Dirac's~Sea of pre-particles
Tesla's~3:6:9
Casimir~Effect
Gödel's~Incompleteness Theorems
Pascal's~Triangle -1~∞~1+
Wooden's~Ultimate L
Heisenberg's~Uncertainty Principle
Brans–Dicke~Scalar–Tensor Theory
Sapir-Whorf~“ -c>∞<c+ ”

The KnoWell equation is written on the letters, I AM.

From a message that Father delivered to me during my death experience and a message that took me 26 years to interpret, an equation written on the name of GOD emerged from 2 terabytes of abstract artwork.

Another blanket Michael type statement is that Science will never find the GOD equation using the current number line, -∞<0.0<∞+, that contains an infinite number of infinities.

Scientist need to channel their GOD like mental powers to reduce the infinite number of infinities into a singular infinity, or simply just apply the KnoWell that uses a new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, with a singular infinity.

Michael is myopic, Big Bang Blind, and he cannot conceive what being one breath away from life is like. I have a memory of being in a void where there is no breathing.

While being dead, I was given a unique perspective of life!

I have written numerous emails to those that might listen, and below is a link to many of the correspondences.
http://lynchphoto.com/letters

As long as Science uses the current number line, -∞<0.0<∞+, to try to convey concepts, great minds will remain trapped in wormholes made of mirrors, and brilliant scientists will forever be deep down in black holes filled with rabbits.

Clearly the GOD equation can never be derived by using the number line, -∞<0.0<∞+, with its infinite number of infinities, and anyone that thinks they can resolve the infinite number of infinites on the current number line, -∞<0.0<∞+, into a singular GOD equation will forever be chasing their tail.

However; there is a solution, but science must use a new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, to resolve the infinite number of infinites problem.

Below is a link that shows graphically a comparison between the Newtonian Universe and the KnoWellian Universe.

http://lynchphoto.com/disney

An added benefit of the KnoWell is that the equation is drawn using the letters, I A M. When Moses asked the burning bush, what do I tell the Israelites is your name. The response was, I am that I am, so I have created an equation that is drawn on the name of GOD.

In the over 2500 years since Anaximander put forth the philosophy of apeiron, not a single person, that I know of, has produced a diagram of his concept.

Using the 27 dimensions of bosonic strings, breaking Einstein's T into a past, an instant, and a future component, the structure of the KnoWell is used to express Anaximander's apeiron.

http://lynchphoto.com/bosonic

If there ever was an equation that science should consider to be a GOD equation, I submit that the KnoWell should be peer reviewed.

Science's greatest mistake is 0.0

Regards,
David Noel Lynch