From: David
        Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
        To: Paul J. Steinhardt <steinh at princeton.edu>
        Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021, 04:07:27 PM EDT
        Subject: Bouncing Cosmology
        
        Paul,
        
        Since the Universe suggests to you that there is a cyclic cosmological
        bounce, maybe you can fathom that instead
        of the grand totality of the entire universe expanding and contracting
        over eons, imagine that at each and every instant of a moment
        the entirety of all matter in the Universe is currently in a state of
        expansion and contraction.
        
        HOYLE'S STEADY STATE
        
        "The emergence of the Universe is the precipitation of chaos through the
        evaporation of control."~3K
        
        The collision between the expansion and the contraction is what
        generates the 3 degree kelvin background radiation.
        
        I have tried to explain my hypothesis to numerous scientific minds
        including
        my 8 Jul 2010 letter to you that includes my 4 Feb 2010 letter to Fay
        Dowker that details how to apply strings M theory
        to answer the cosmological expansion and contraction of which you BLeave
        takes eons.
        http://www.lynchphoto.com/letters.html
        
        The language of mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+,  has lead science
        astray.
        This linear mentality has forced great minds deep into black holes
        filled with rabbits.
        Infinite this, infinite that, infinite infinity. The number line is an
        infinite mess of rabbit holes.
        
        The solution is simple, a new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”,
        is required to replace the Big Bang theory with Hoyle's Steady State.
        With this new axiom, the linear number line becomes a Triangulum.
        http://www.lynchphoto.com/triangulum
        
        The language of mathematics is the problem, and 0.0 is science's
        greatest mistake.
        
        Science has become as blind as religion is deaf.
        
        I challenge science to open their eyes, and religion to open their ears,
        the language of mathematics has become God. 
        
        To bad, your BLeaf in mathematics', -∞<0.0<∞+, axiom has lead you
        astray.
        
        I am amazed how smart people do not find a number line with an infinite
        number of infinities to be a problem.
        
        Regards,
        David Noel Lynch
        
       
    
      
    
      
    From: David
        Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
    To: "Paul
        Steinhardt" <steinh at princeton.edu>
        Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 06:26:25 AM EDT
        Subject: Broken Links
        
        Paul,
         
        On your web page that provides a wealth of information,
        http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~steinh/
         
        the following links are not working.
        Theoretical Cosmology in Jadwin Hall
        
        Experimental astrophysics and cosmology in Jadwin Hall
        
          
        
        On the Morgan Freeman special,
        you mention that the detection of gravity waves would suggest that the
        Inflationary Big Bang Theory would win out over the cyclic branes
        theory.
        
         
        
        Imagine for a moment that the two branes do not bounce off each other.
        That the two branes are passing through each other.
        One brane is a particle state, and one brane in a wave state.
        This interaction could produce gravity waves.
        
         
        
        Below is an email that I sent to Fay Dowker and carbon copied to Neil
        Turok. In the email,
        I give a detailed description of the two branes relating them to dark
        energy and dark matter.
        
         
        
        "Mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+, has lead theorists to a BLeaf in a Big
        Bang.....
        Using the mathematical axiom, -c>∞<c+, the Universe becomes a
        steady state system." ~ 3K
         
        To be able to envision this new Universe view,
        I present to you a quantum mirror built in the spirit of Hegel that uses
        the energy of Einstein, the force of Newton,
        and the logic of Socrates, to describe a moment of time.
        Below is a link to a video of me drawing what I call a KnoWell. Time is
        a Trapezoid..
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKEqgptciLc
        
         
        
        Your thoughts are most welcome,
        David Noel Lynch
        
         
        
        From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
        To: Fay Dowker <f.dowker at imperial.ac.uk>
        Cc: Neil Turok <N.G.Turok at damtp.cam.ac.uk>;
        Brian Cox <Brian.Cox at cern.ch>; Peter Ware Higgs <P.W.Higgs
        at ed.ac.uk>
        Sent: Thu, February 4, 2010 5:43:46 AM
        Subject: a >Grain∞Brain< w
        
        
        Fay,
        
         
        
        Bravo. Brilliant. Namaste.
        
         
        
        In the Brian Cox video, “What is time?”,
        based on Grain theory, you suggest that the smooth space time of
        Einstein’s General Relativity Continuum is actually bitty or granular.
        In the same video, based on the theory of Brane Worlds, Neil Turok says,
        “I think, time probably, has always been there, and always will be
        there.”
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYmdgHyCF_Q
        
         
        
        While Grain theory is clearly a very dynamic way to look at time,
        Brane theory is nearly a static way to look at time.
        To express this duality, orthodox theorists could use the General
        Relativity Space Time Continuum as the benchmark.
        While Grain theory requires a fragmented continuum, Brane theory works
        well with a smooth continuum.
        
         
        
        Since Grain theory requires a serious modification to General
        Relativity, a fundamental scientist will shy away from Grain theory and
        lean towards Brane theory.
        As you KnoWell, scientific discovery is a cumulative process, and
        fragmenting the smooth space time continuum is a tall order to fill.
        Like when Einstein derived his equations that explained the orbit of
        Mercury, his method was to augment Newton’s equations for gravity,
        not replace them. In much the same way, Grain theory must modify
        Einstein’s General Relativity.
        
         
        
        "Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true." ~ Niels
        Bohr
        
         
        
        One solution to the fragmentation problem could be resolved by finding
        the Higgs Boson.
        Till then, maybe there is a way to fragment the space time continuum
        with a couple of Branes.
        However; to use nearly static Branes to resolve the nearly dynamic
        Grains is counter intuitive.
        Especially considering the multitude of observations that strongly
        suggest that gravity
        is warping the space time continuum in a direct relationship to mass.
        To complicate the situation, we must keep in mind the theory of
        inflation to explain the uniformity in the background radiation,
        the theory of dark matter to explain the missing mass, and the theory
        dark energy to explain the current acceleration in the expansion of the
        Universe.
        
         
        
        As letters can be arranged into words, numbers can be arranged into
        equations. In doing so, both words and equations gain meaning.
        From scientific peer reviews, equations gain meaning,. From these
        reviewed equations, new concepts can be abstracted that will change the
        course of human knowledge.
        Since the language chosen by science to convey concepts is mathematics,
        any postulate must conform to the standard axioms of mathematics.
        Using the most basic tool, -∞<0.0<∞+, the number line, below is a
        verbal abstraction that will ultimately combine the two infinities of
        the number line into one singular infinity.
        This new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, explains how to get
        Grains from Branes.
        
         
        
        Using the analogy of a number line, place “Brane a”, alpha, on the
        negative side, and place “Brane w”, omega, on the positive side.
        As in Neil’s Brane Worlds theory, collide the two Branes. “Brane a”,
        with a velocity of the speed of light, moves in a positive direction,
        c+,
        and “Brane w”, with a velocity of the speed of light, moves in a
        negative direction, c-.
        Each Brane traverses the number line to the 0.0 point where “Brane a”
        collides with “Brane w”.
        
         
        
        Unlike Neil’s replenishing and bouncing of Branes, “Brane a” and “Brane
        w” are continually passing through each other exchanging information.
        The resultant is an infinitesimal creation of space that is reflected in
        time by a Grain that adheres to Einstein’s E=mc^2.
        The Big Bang is a Steady State process that is induced by this constant
        collision of “Brane a”, Dark Energy, and “Brane w”, Dark Matter.
        
         
        
        Using the analogy of time, “Brane a” resides in a particle state that
        can be called the past, and “Brane w” resides in a wave state that can
        be called the future.
        The arrow of time is a dual function of the past’s particles that are
        derived from the future’s waves, and the future’s waves are the
        inversion of the past’s particles.
        The so called “Now” occurs at the infinitesimal 0.0 point where the two
        Branes collide producing Grains.
        This process or “Rain” can be expressed by using Einstein’s General
        Relativity Continuum equations.
        The "Rain" theory stands on top of Einstein’s shoulders suggesting that
        at the number line’s 0.0 point, all of time merges,
        only for an brief instant, into one “Future-Present-Past” bundle of
        time.
        This miraculous combination of three time states can be described as the
        infinite one, the EinSof point.
        
         
        
        The mechanics behind the collision of “Brane a” with “Brane w” rests in
        the duality between negative and positive.
        An attraction., a magnetism, between Dark Energy’s strong force that is
        interchanging with Dark Matter‘s weak force.
        The result is a Grain that is forever trapped between an extrusion
        outward from inner space, and a collapsing inward from outer space.
        As “Brane a”, exchanges places with “Brane w”, the force of the
        collision causes friction that gives rise to all rotations in the
        Universe.
        This harmonic relationship between “Brane a” and “Brane w” is why the
        background radiation appears to be so uniform.
        
         
        
        In this model, the motive force behind “Brane a” is control, and the
        motive force behind “Brane w” is chaos.
        Control may take the form of quantum loops of gravity, and chaos may
        take the form of a Dirac sea of pre-particles. Projecting through “Brane
        a”,
        the transitional barrier could be the speed of light, and projecting
        through “Brane w”, the outer barrier could be absolute zero.
        Beyond “Brane a”, would be the domain of perfect control, and beyond
        “Brane w” would be pure chaos.
        Thus “Brane a” is a collection of standard model subatomic particles,
        and “Brane w“ is a Dirac sea filled with pre-particles.
        
         
        
        On a cosmic scale this effect can been observed around galaxies in the
        form of what current theories postulate is evidence of Dark Matter.
        As emerging particles from the central black hole radiate symmetrical
        emission lines, chaotic waves are aligned into harmonics.
        As more and more emerging particle’s radiate lines of symmetry, more and
        more chaotic waves stack up on top of each other creating compression
        zones.
        These compression zones are evident in the star light bending around
        massive objects.
        The more massive the object, the more wave energy collapsing in from
        outer space. Thus the more the star light bends.
        The compression of outer space trying to reach inner space, causes
        gravity to warp the space time continuum.
        At the “Rain” precipitation threshold, “Brane a”, in particle form, and
        “Brane w” in wave form, interchange information resulting the creation
        of a Grain.
        
         
        
        Gravity is a push caused by the collapse of outer space, and the
        friction between “Brane a” and “Brane w” is what causes each Grain to be
        formed.
        As the new Grain particle radiates, the Universe continues to heat up
        from the current 3K.
        This creation of Grains, that add more radiation to the Universe, is
        what causes the continued acceleration.
        The counter balance to the acceleration is the collapse of outer space.
        As outer space collapses,
        the light from distant stars is stretched causing the observed red shift
        making the Universe appear to be cooling.
        The duality suggests that the Big Bang requires a Steady State system to
        exploit.
        
         
        
        Welcome to the “Rain” paradox.
        
         
        
        "Mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+, has lead theorists to a BLeaf in a Big
        Bang.....
        Using the mathematical axiom, -c>∞<c+, the Universe becomes a
        steady state system." ~ 3K
         
        To be able to envision this new Universe view,
        I present to you a quantum mirror built in the spirit of Hegel that uses
        the energy of Einstein, the force of Newton, and the logic of Socrates,
        to describe a moment of time. Below is a link to a video of me drawing
        what I call a KnoWell. Time is a Trapezoid..
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKEqgptciLc
        
         
        
        Since few people will entertain conversations that questioned the
        validity of the big bang,
        I turned to expressing myself using abstract art. Teachers always want
        their students to show their work.
        Below is a link to an image of how I derived the KnoWell equation. The
        original image is 4'x8'.
        
        http://www.lynchphoto.com/elohim.html
        
         
        
        Below is a link to an image that shows how the KnoWell is extrapolated
        out of Newton's logic.
        
        http://www.lynchphoto.com/disney.html
        
         
        
        I have created 2.75 terabytes of images and art. Below is a link to the
        KnoWell expressed in set notation.
        
        http://www.lynchphoto.com/wreck.html
        
         
        
        "N Sanity is a funny state, one never quite knows when they have
        arrived." ~ 3K
        
        http://www.lynchphoto.com/question.html
        
         
        
        Brian Cox asks,“What time is it?”
        “I have no Earthly idea.” ~3K
        
         
        
        Best wishes,
        David Noel Lynch