Teachers always want their students to show their work. Below is a link to an image of how I derived the KnoWell equation. The original image is 4'x8'.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/elohim.html
From: Stephen Crothers <thenarmis at gmail.com>
To: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
Sent: Sun, March 14, 2010 9:28:56 PM
Subject: Re: The Phantom Bounce: A New Proposal for an Oscillating Cosmology
Dear DAvid,
Thanks for your email.
I'm of the school of thought that General Relativity is meaningless
because it violates the usual conservation of energy and momentum as
established by experiment. I also feel that cosmology is not science,
but quasi-religion. In addition feel that the Higgs boson is a fantasy
and that string theory has no physical meaning. The question of
beginning has its roots in the mortality of life and this is projected
upon the Universe by the human condition. A longing for knowledge of
beginnings does not make the universe have a beginning, howsoever
intense that longing might be.
I agree with you that black holes are nonsense, merely the product of
faulty mathematics and physical misconceptions. The mystery
surrounding the black hole has the mantle too of quasi-religious
propensities, and for that reason it has been easy to sell, just as
the Big Bang dogma, to the public at large as well as much of the
scientific community.
For what its worth I see no reason to suggest that the Universe is not
infinite in extent in both space and time. The WMAP, COBE and Planck
satellites are nothing but space junk. None have in fact measured the
afterglow of the alleged Bang. The CMB is actually due to the oceans
of the Earth and is therefore not cosmic. I refer you to the following
remarkable papers:
Robitaille P.-M.
COBE: A Radiological Analysis
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2009/PP-19-03.PDF
Robitaille P.-M.
WMAP: A Radiological Analysis
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2007/PP-08-01.PDF
Robitaille P.-M.
Calibration of Microwave Reference Blackbodies and Targets for Use in
Satellite Observations: An Analysis of Errors in Theoretical Outlooks
and Testing Procedures
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2010/PP-22-01.PDF
Robitaille P.-M.
The Planck Satellite LFI and the Microwave Background: Importance of
the 4K Reference Targets
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2010/PP-22-02.PDF
Robitaille P.-M.
On the Origins of the CMB: Insight from the COBE, WMAP, and Relikt-1 Satellites
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2007/PP-08-02.PDF
Robitaille P.-M.
On the Earth Microwave Background: Absorption and Scattering by the Atmosphere
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2007/PP-10-01.PDF
Robitaille P.-M.
On the Nature of the Microwave Background at the Lagrange 2 Point. Part I
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2007/PP-11-11.PDF
Robitaille P.-M.
The Earth Microwave Background (EMB), Atmospheric Scattering and the
Generation of Isotropy
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2008/PP-13-24.PDF
Robitaille P.-M.
Kirchhoff's Law of Thermal Emission: 150 Years
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2009/PP-19-01.PDF
Kind regards,
Steve Crothers.
On 3/15/10, David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com> wrote:
Stephen,
In 2004, I came to terms with the fact that black holes are a mathematical
anomaly. A mistake rooted deep in the very language of mathematics..
Below is a series of emails that have not generated a response from those
addressed. Understandably since my position strongly suggests that Hoyle’s
Steady State is the better explanation than a Big Bang as to how the
universe is at work. I suggest that our limiting factor in trying to
describe the universe rests on the number line. My conclusion is that 0.0
is
an error, so I replace 0.0 with infinity. Since infinity now rests in the
center of the number line, the old negative and positive infinites are
replaced with a negative and positive speed of light respectively.
"Mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+, has lead theorists to a BLeaf in a Big Bang.....
Using the mathematical axiom, -c>∞<c+, the Universe becomes a steady
state
system." ~ 3K
To be able to envision this new Universe view, I present to you a quantum
mirror built in the spirit of Hegelthat uses the energy of Einstein, the
force of Newton, and the logic of Socrates, to describe a moment of time.
Below is a link to a video of me drawing what I call a KnoWell. Time is
a
Trapezoid..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKEqgptciLc
Your thoughts are most welcome.
Best wishes,
David Noel Lynch
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Katherine Freese <ktfreese at umich.edu>
Cc: William H. Kinney <whkinney at buffalo.edu>; Corrado Ruscica <corrado
at corradoruscica.it>; Fred Partus <fpartus at yahoo.com>
Sent: Tue, February 23, 2010 4:37:38 PM
Subject: The Phantom Bounce: A New Proposal for an Oscillating Cosmology
Hello,
While sitting at a bar in the summer
of 2004, I turned to a friend and just blurted out, "Can entropy bounce?'
With little delay his response was a resounding, "No." Turing to
him with a serious look on my face,
I said, "I think entropy bounces like the wings of a butterfly. Like the
oscillations of Hoyle‘s Steady State"
Sadly by invoking Hoyle, it was like
I had committed a cardinal sin. I had questioned the validity of Big Bang
theory.
I was not willing to just say, “No“, so I kept working on my hypothesis
that entropy was in a state of flux.
Over the years, I have been searching
for threads that can be woven in to my theory.
Last night, I picked up the current Scientific American, and I noticed the
article regarding “Dark Stars”.
An interesting position not adequately described in the article, so I went
to your website looking for a detailed paper.
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~ktfreese/
What caught my eye was a pleasant surprise, “The
Phantom Bounce: A New Proposal for an Oscillating Cosmology”.
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0802/0802.2583v2.pdf
Finally someone out there has provided
a professional look at the possibility that entropy does indeed bounce.
The Phantom Bounce paper does a great job of explaining how the current Big
Bang theory could have a phantom component that causes entropy to bounce.
Setting in the stage for an oscillating universe.
As you KnoWell, for any theory to gain
acceptance in the scientific community, the language of mathematics must
be invoked to express said theory.
The Phantom Bounce paper does a great job providing equations that express
the phantom force in the states of expansion and contraction.
From negative infinity to positive infinity including a nudge factor to allow
the crossing of the 0.0 threshold.
I firmly Bleave that the Phantom Bounce
theory is on the correct path.
That quantum loop gravity and super string branes are at work in the creation
of the universe.
Where I differ is that the language of mathematics has lead science astray.
That the number line is the reason that science has yet to crack the code.
Yet to step outside of the axioms of mathematics to express a theory is pure
insanity.
What I ask of you in to look in the quantum
mirror..
Ask yourself, since the universe is made of atoms, what can be nothing?
Even Phantom Bounce must deal with the special case of 0.0.
Also since the universe is made of atoms, what can be infinite?
Again, Phantom Bounce has to deal with the abstract of a singularity.
A solution to this paradox is to replace
the zero point zero on the number line with infinity.
At the negative and positive ends where the infinities are currently positioned,
place a negative and positive c, speed of light.
Under this mathematical model, the Phantom Bounce does not occur at each end
of the Universe cycle, but in the very center.
At each and every moment what appears to be the Big Bang is the constant collision
between quantum loops of gravity and super string branes.
The result is a Steady Bang Big State Universe. -SB>∞<BS+
"Mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+,
has lead theorists to a BLeaf in a Big Bang.....
Using the mathematical axiom, -c>∞<c+, the Universe becomes a steady
state system." ~ 3K
Below is a letter that I sent to Fay
Dowker in response to her answer to brane Cox's question "What is time?".
In the below letter, I express how the above mathematical axiom, -c>∞<c+
explains the observed universe.
Best wishes,
David Noel Lynch
From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Fay Dowker <f.dowker at imperial.ac.uk>
Cc: Neil Turok <N.G.Turok at damtp.cam.ac.uk>; Brian Cox <Brian.Cox
at cern.ch>; Peter Ware Higgs <P.W.Higgs at ed.ac.uk>
Sent: Thu, February 4, 2010 5:43:46 AM
Subject: a >Grain∞Brane< w
Fay,
Bravo. Brilliant. Namaste.
In the Brian Cox video, “What is
time?”, based on Grain theory,
you suggest that the smooth space time of Einstein’s General Relativity
Continuum is actually bitty or granular.
In the same video, based on the theory of brane Worlds, Neil Turok says,
“
I think, time probably, has always been there, and always will be there.”
While Grain theory is clearly a very
dynamic way to look at time, brane theory is nearly a static way to look
at time.
To express this duality, orthodox theorists could use the General Relativity
Space Time Continuum as the benchmark.
While Grain theory requires a fragmented continuum, brane theory works well
with a smooth continuum.
Since Grain theory requires a serious
modification to General Relativity,
a fundamental scientist will shy away from Grain theory and lean towards brane
theory.
As you KnoWell, scientific discovery is a cumulative process,
and fragmenting the smooth space time continuum is a tall order to fill.
Like when Einstein derived his equations that explained the orbit of Mercury,
his method was to augment Newton’s equations for gravity, not replace
them.
In much the same way, Grain theory must modify Einstein’s General Relativity.
"Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true." ~ Niels Bohr
One solution to the fragmentation problem
could be resolved by finding the Higgs Boson.
Till then, maybe there is a way to fragment the space time continuum with a
couple of branes.
However; to use nearly static branes to resolve the nearly dynamic Grains is
counter intuitive.
Especially considering the multitude of observations that strongly suggest
that gravity is warping the space time continuum in a direct relationship to
mass.
To complicate the situation, we must keep in mind the theory of inflation to
explain the uniformity in the background radiation,
the theory of dark matter to explain the missing mass, and the theory dark
energy to explain the current acceleration in the expansion of the Universe.
As letters can be arranged into words,
numbers can be arranged into equations.
In doing so, both words and equations gain meaning. From scientific peer reviews,
equations gain meaning,.
From these reviewed equations, new concepts can be abstracted that will change
the course of human knowledge.
Since the language chosen by science to convey concepts is mathematics, any
postulate must conform to the standard axioms of mathematics.
Using the most basic tool, -∞<0.0<∞+, the number line, below
is a verbal abstraction that will ultimately combine the two infinities of
the number line into one singular infinity.
This new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, explains
how to get Grains from branes.
Using the analogy of a number line, place “brane
a”, alpha, on the negative side, and place “brane w”, omega,
on the positive side.
As in Neil’s brane Worlds theory, collide the two branes. “brane
a”, with a velocity of the speed of light, moves in a positive direction,
c+,
and “brane w”, with a velocity of the speed of light, moves in
a negative direction, c-.
Each brane traverses the number line to the 0.0 point where “brane a” collides
with “brane w”.
Unlike Neil’s replenishing and
bouncing of branes, “brane a” and “brane w” are continually
passing through each other exchanging information.
The resultant is an infinitesimal creation of space that is reflected in time
by a Grain that adheres to Einstein’s E=mc^2.
The Big Bang is a Steady State process that is induced by this constant collision
of “brane a”, Dark Energy, and “brane w”, Dark Matter.
Using the analogy of time, “brane
a” resides in a particle state that can be called the past, and “brane
w” resides in a wave state that can be called the future.
The arrow of time is a dual function of the past’s particles that are
derived from the future’s waves, and the future’s waves are the
inversion of the past’s particles.
The so called “Now” occurs at the infinitesimal 0.0 point where
the two branes collide producing Grains.
This process or “Rain” can be expressed by using Einstein’s
General Relativity Continuum equations.
The "Rain" theory stands on top of Einstein’s shoulders suggesting
that at the number line’s 0.0 point, all of time merges, only for an
brief instant,
into one “Future-Present-Past” bundle of time. This miraculous
combination of three time states can be described as the infinite one, the
EinSof point.
The mechanics behind the collision of “brane
a” with “brane w” rests in the duality between negative
and positive.
An attraction., a magnetism, between Dark Energy’s strong force that
is interchanging with Dark Matter‘s weak force.
The result is a Grain that is forever trapped between an extrusion outward
from inner space, and a collapsing inward from outer space.
As “brane a”, exchanges places with “brane w”, the
force of the collision causes friction that gives rise to all rotations in
the Universe.
This harmonic relationship between “Brian a” and “brane w” is
why the background radiation appears to be so uniform.
In this model, the motive force behind “brane
a” is control, and the motive force behind “brane w” is
chaos.
Control may take the form of quantum loops of gravity, and chaos may take the
form of a Dirac sea of pre-particles.
Projecting through “brane a”, the transitional barrier could be
the speed of light, and projecting through “brane w”, the outer
barrier could be absolute zero.
Beyond “brane a”, would be the domain of perfect control, and beyond “brane
w” would be pure chaos.
Thus “brane a” is a collection of standard model subatomic particles,
and “brane w“ is a Dirac sea filled with pre-particles.
On a cosmic scale this effect can been
observed around galaxies in the form of what current theories postulate is
evidence of Dark Matter.
As emerging particles from the central black hole radiate symmetrical emission
lines, chaotic waves are aligned into harmonics.
As more and more emerging particle’s radiate lines of symmetry, more
and more chaotic waves stack up on top of each other creating compression zones.
These compression zones are evident in the star light bending around massive
objects. The more massive the object, the more wave energy collapsing in from
outer space.
Thus the more the star light bends. The compression of outer space trying to
reach inner space, causes gravity to warp the space time continuum.
At the “Rain” precipitation threshold, “brane a”, in
particle form, and “brane w” in wave form, interchange information
resulting the creation of a Grain.
Gravity is a push caused by the collapse
of outer space, and the friction between “brane a” and “brane
w” is what causes each Grain to be formed.
As the new Grain particle radiates, the Universe continues to heat up from
the current 3K.
This creation of Grains, that add more radiation to the Universe, is what causes
the continued acceleration.
The counter balance to the acceleration is the collapse of outer space.
As outer space collapses, the light from distant stars is stretched causing
the observed red shift making the Universe appear to be cooling.
The duality suggests that the Big Bang requires a Steady State system to exploit.
Welcome to the “Rain” paradox.
"Mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+,
has lead theorists to a BLeaf in a Big Bang.....
Using the mathematical axiom, -c>∞<c+, the Universe becomes a steady
state system." ~ 3K
To be able to envision this new Universe view,
I present to you a quantum mirror built in the spirit of Hegel that uses the
energy of Einstein, the force of Newton, and the logic of Socrates,
to describe a moment of time. Below is a link to a video of me drawing what
I call a KnoWell. Time is a Trapezoid..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKEqgptciLc
Since few people will entertain conversations
that questioned the validity of the big bang, I turned to expressing myself
using abstract art.
Teachers always want their students to show their work. Below is a link to
an image of how I derived the KnoWell equation. The original image is 4'x8'.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/elohim.html
Below is a link to an image that shows
how the KnoWell is extrapolated out of Newton's logic.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/disney.html
I have created 2.75 terabytes of images
and art. Below is a link to the KnoWell expressed in set notation.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/wreck.html
"N Sanity is a funny state, one
never quite knows when they have arrived." ~ 3K
http://www.lynchphoto.com/question.html
Brian Cox asks,“What time is it?”
“ I have no Earthly idea.” ~3K
Best wishes,
David Noel Lynch