An Equation for ISCAPWednesday, January 2, 2008 7:15 PM

From: "David Lynch" <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: "Brian Greene" <greene at math.columbia.edu>
Cc: "Alvin Plantinga" <plantinga.1 at nd.edu>

Brian,
Bravo. You are on the correct path.
Quote, "One primary focus of ISCAP is the search for subtle signatures of string theory that may be imprinted in the precision cosmological data.... "
All cosmological data is an imprint from super strings, and I have an equation that shows this graphically.
I use the logic of Socrates, the force of Newton, and the energy of Einstein to describe a moment of time.

http://www.lynchphoto.com/wreck.html

Einstein's energy equation says E=(T(+l+w+h)c^2). The KnoWell says, ((P(+l+w+h)c)*(F(-l-w-h)c))
The Past is a positive particle and the Future is a negative wave, an inversion of what was.
We are using waves, super strings, to etch atoms at a 3K rate. Implies no Big Bang.
Best of luck in finding data that suggests that super strings are the finger print of creation.
One such signature could be the halo around galaxies that the big bangers are seeing as proof of their missing link, dark energy, dark matter.
What if this halo is the threshold where super strings are forcing sub atomic particles from the vastness of outer space into position to become particles.
This mindset is a quantum leap from classical physics. Outer space is in a state of collapse while inner space is in a state of expansion.
Below I describe in detail the reason behind this conclusion.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/hutchison.html

Below is a letter that I sent to Alvin Plantinga at Notre Dame. I use the laws of Arthur C. Clarke to model my position.
The Universe is in a Hoyle Steady State.

Thank you for your time,
David Noel Lynch

Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 03:50:09 -0800 (PST)
From: "David Lynch" <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Socrates, Newton, and Einstein
To: "Alvin Plantinga" <plantinga.1 at nd.edu>

Alvin,

Please pardon my interruption in your busy day.
With the utmost respect, I wish to try and present an impossibility to you.
Bear with me. This is going to be near imposable.

Arther C. Clarke states in his second law that,
"The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."

For the purpose of communicating a point,
will you take the position of the elderly scientists in Clarke's first law,
"When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible,
he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong."

My challenge is to perform an act of magic like in Clarke's third law,
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

At the beginning of an illusion, a magician makes their pledge to the audience.
Setting the stage for the improbable to occur, the magician has to challenge a person's BLeaf and mindset.
I pledge to produce an equation that will prove that there was not a Big Bang.

The turn is where the magician would show the tremendous amount of evidence that suggests that there was a Big Bang.
Using modern science's, equations, observations, and data sets to show overwhelmingly that there was a Big Bang.
Leading the audience down a path of what they think is the obvious.

Then the prestige is where the magician produces the imposable.
Using the logic of Socrates, the force of Newton, and the energy of Einstein, I split the photon into particle and wave with a KnoWell.

http://www.lynchphoto.com/avignon.html

At this point, I would walk off stage with everyone looking at the equation thinking that was no magic trick.
I would have to sit there and explain every position of each words till the they made sense out of it...

The above symbol that I call the KnoWell is the culmination of four years of discovery.
I can fully explain every detail in the KnoWell symbol and have done so in many emails to several great minds..
Like the letter that I sent to John Hutchison using the logic of the KnoWell symbol to try and explain his levitation effect to John.
Below is my most detailed explanation of the logic behind the KnoWell that I have written to date.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/hutchison.html

What I cannot explain, is how could the reflection of an abstract photograph that I took of the
Paris Casino neon balloon in Las Vegas contain lines that match up to planetary motions..
This is the true imposable that I cannot explain.

http://www.lynchphoto.com/seven.html

A detailed letter regarding the above impossibility is at the below link.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/yarbrough.html

Below is a letter to Itzhack Bars a physicist that has tried to explain the short falls in
the equations for the Big Bang by adding a fourth dimension and a second time line..
Kind of like what Guth did to try and explain why the universe was so uniformly cooled as learned by the WMAP data.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/bars.html

Instead of facing the reality of Hoyle's steady state like the KnoWell suggest,
Guth created inflation where the four forces come together so that matter could defy the speed limit of light and get to the vast distances needed.
Thus the mathematical models could still prove the Big Bang. Like being programed by a magician, people see what they think they see..

Einstein's energy equation says E=(T(+l+w+h)c^2). The KnoWell says, ((P(+l+w+h)c)+(F(-l-w-h)c))
The Past is a positive particle and the Future is a negative wave, and inversion of what was.
We are using waves to etching atoms at 3K.

Hoyle just could not explain how the hydrogen got here.
The KnoWell shows that super strings transform the photon wave through quantum loops of gravity that condense into particles.
The basic atomic building blocks that expand space.

If you did not read the information at the hutchison and bars links, then my above paragraph is gibberish.
If all the information in this email is gibberish, then I apologize for a magic trick that failed in my face.
I did not escape the straight jacket. Rope burnt. I dropped to the ground. Please forgive my intrusion.

Why did I do it, because I am trying to describe to myself how I could have experienced what I did in a serious car wreck on June 19th 1977...
I died. I was a wave. No body. Below is a letter that I wrote to my step daughter marking 30 years since the event.
It contains my most detailed description of my death experience.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/dotson.html

Best wishes,
David Noel Lynch