Sent: Monday, July 12, 2021, 02:14:00 PM EDT
Subject: Broken link
John,
On your website
https://www.johnhorgan.org/
The link with your Twitter address is broken
He tweets as @horganism.
Returns a Not Found on server error.
After reading your Scientific American article,
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/quantum-mechanics-the-mind-body-problem-and-negative-theology/
I was going to tweet you an equation that I created to help me explain
a death experience of mine on 19 Jun 1977.
The equation uses the logic of Lynch, the energy of Einstein, the force of Newton,
and the sayings of Socrates to describe a moment of time as infinite.
I call the equation the KnoWell.
The foundation of the KnoWell is Socrates', All that I know is that I know nothing.
I have written many emails to numerous individuals explaining how to apply the KnoWell
to questions raised by modern cosmological observations.
The quantum leap is that Science uses a language that contains an
infinite number of errors with 0.0 being Science's greatest mistake.
In my letter to Fay Dowker,
I use string theories' branes to explain how the universe is in a steady state.
I understand that weblinks are potential ransomeware land mines,
so I with hesitation post the below link to my Fay Dowker email.
Letter to Fay Dowker (lynchphoto.com)
In the Dowker email,
I explain how Science has been lead astray by using
the fundamental tool called the number line, -∞<0.0<∞+,
and I propose a new axiom of mathematics to resolve the infinite number of errors, “ -c>∞<c+ ”.
In my most recent email to Avi Loeb,
Letter to Avi Loeb 11 Jul 2021 (lynchphoto.com)
I explain how Science needs to have a stroke,
and how Science needs a new axiom to eliminate the mathematical anomalies
that give rise to such theories as mulit~verse / many~worlds.
In my email to Julian Barbour,
Letter to Julian Barbour, Katie Robertson, and David Sloan 24 Feb 2020 (lynchphoto.com)
I explain how the KnoWell emerged out of 2 terabytes of abstract artwork,
and suggest that the KnoWell is the answer to the articles' statement,
"We have to think out of the box and readjust our thinking to what is really happening in the Universe."
I have not received a response from Julian.
My guess is that eliminating the current axiom of mathematics , -∞<0.0<∞+,
is more like box destruction than just thinking outside the box.
Neil deGrasse Tyson responded to my email to him, "Ideas are cheap.
Detailed predictions of unknown phenomena from those ideas is the real testing ground.
When you produce such a list of testable predictions I will be happy to comment on it."
The KnoWell is that Real Testing Ground,
but Neil is deep inside the mathematical box to see outside.
I mailed him a print of an abstract photo with a personalized hand drawn KnoWell on the back.
I find the negative theology most interesting.
For if you read my Dowker email,
you will discover that the entire right side of the KnoWell is in a state of Chaos.
The father away from the infinitesimal moment, the greater the Chaos.
In turn the entire left side of the KnoWell is in a state of Control,
the father away from the infinitesimal moment, the greater the Control.
Your article brings to light this division, and my KnoWell provides a potential solution.
Letters Sent to Those That Might Listen (lynchphoto.com)
"The Emergence of the Universe is the Precipitation of Chaos through the Evaporation of Control."~3K
Best Regards,
David Noel Lynch