From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: israel socratus <socratus at mail.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2015 3:54 AM
Subject: Re: History of the "quantum of action" (1900-1927) / by Socratus /

Israel,

Nice to hear from you. Quite the interesting read. I latched on to Dirac with his infinite sea.

www.lynchphoto.com/disney

At the moment of the instant that a "quantum of action" occurs, is not a tensor created?
"The Emergence of the Universe is the precipitation of Chaos through the evaporation of Control." ~3K

www,lynchphoto.com/avignon

In the above linked webpage the KnoWell model
can be used to express the equation "(-E=Mc^2) "
The "-E" is in the Dira Sea above the words Ein Sof
The "M" is below Ein Sof at the instant of a moment
Where two c "quantum actions" Antiquity, and Eternity
exchange place through oblivion's particle and wave.

The below linked letter describes the book that I am writing.
The scene is set for 19 Jun 2020. Going to create some art
while explaining how to apply the KnoWell to modern questions.
Letter to Mark Tremonti

http://www.lynchphoto.com/ghosts

Would you mind if I wrote you into the story? Placing you there in 2020.
Would like to include your below 1913 to 1927 quotes.
Having you explain "quantum of action".

Please do let me know your thoughts,
David

From: israel socratus <socratus at mail.com>
To: dnl1960 at yahoo.com; mriversong at earthlink.net; mjpnathan at yahoo.com; ernestocrespo at solarsystem.e.telefonica.net; mail at intelligentdesigntheory.info
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2015 2:44 AM
Subject: History of the "quantum of action" (1900-1927) / by Socratus /

History of the "quantum of action" (1900-1927) / by Socratus /
=====.
a)
In 1900 Planck united together two formulas ( Rayleigh–Jeansfor
for long and Wien's for short wavelengths) and then divided them.
He was himself very surprised when the result was found correct.
And after that came . . . .
: " . . . some weeks of the hardest work of my life . . ."
The result was – quantum of action (as energy multiply time: h=Et)
The coefficient (h) was neither in the Rayleigh–Jeansfor nor in the
Wien's formulas. Planck took unit (h) as in some books are written:
"intuitively, instinctively, phenomenologically"
b)
In 1905 Einstein introduced unit (h) in different way.
Einstein wrote it as: h=kb
(Boltzmann coefficient multiply Wien's displacement constant)
And in 1906 Einstein wrote that Planck's and his results are equal.
But Einstein's formula explains quantum nature more clearly.

For practical uses both Planck and Einstein multiplied
"quantum of action" by frequency : E=hf.
c)
In 1913 Bohr introduced "quant of action" in the hydrogen-atom.
d)
In 1916 Sommerfeld wrote that “quantum of action” took part in
the “fine structure ” ( and as result we have complete full formula
of electron’s structure: e^2=ah*c)
e)
In 1923 De Broglie wrote that "quant of action" can be "pilot-wave".
f)
In 1924 Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck wrote that "quant of action"
can work in another way as: h/2pi (h-bar)
g)
In 1924 Pauli discovered that "the quantum of action" must obey
"the exclusion principle".
h)
In 1925 Heisenberg went a step further.
He discovered "the uncertainty principle" (HUP): Et>h*, px>h*.
i)
In the same 1925 year Schrodinger explained that
de Broglie's "pilot-wave" can work as "psi-wave function".
j)
In 1926 Schrodinger found relation between his "psi-wave
function" and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
k)
In 1926 Born showed that could be probability of finding
the "quant of action" in local place of the "psi-wave function".
l)
In1927 Dirac "put into place the last of quantum theory's
building blocks". He "playing with beautiful equations"
explained that the "quantum of action" must have one
negative anti-brother (-E=Mc^2) in "an unobserved infinite sea".
==============…
Result.
The QM interpretation doesn't fit the logical presentation.
Feynman wrote:
" The theory of quantum electrodynamics describes Nature
as absurd from the point of view of common sense.
And it agrees fully with experiment.
So I hope you accept Nature as She is — absurd."
/ Book: QED : The Strange Theory of Light and Matter /

My conclusion.
Nature is not an absurd structure.
It is our "scientific" thought of Nature can be absurd,
it is our "philosophy of science" can be abstract.
How is possible to escape philosophical absurd?
My solution.
The history of the "quantum of action" (1900-1927) shows that
"quantum of action" can be a quantum of light, and
"quantum of action" can be an electron, and
"quantum of action" has connection with an antiparticle . . . . .
In the other words,
quantum of light, electron and antiparticle can be one and the same
real particle of different actions in different conditions. This is possible
because "quantum of action" obeys “ The law of conservation and
transformation energy/mass”. "Quantum of action" has many formulas
and they can be tied together only through physical process of
"transformation" but what "transformation" means according to one
single "quantum of action" nobody explains.
The Existence begins on the quantum level and "quantum of action" is
primary particle of existence. Not from "big bang", not from "Higgs boson",
not from "string particles in 11-D", not from "meson, muon, tau . . . .
and 1000 their brothers" but only from Planck's / Einstein's
"quantum of action" creation of Nature was started.
==..
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
===…