From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Adam Lloyd Johnson <adam at convincingproof.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 08:06:05 PM EDT
Subject: Freethought Florida Debate
Adam,
Your debate with Dan Barker contains comments regarding the Multi-Verse
that everyday the clouds formed a message.
https://youtu.be/H32WynQMke0
In my email to Michelle Thaller and Michio Kaku, I explain how Science has
an irreconcilable paradox.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/thaller
"A scientist whom is an atheist is quick to BLeave that there are an
infinite number of universes in the multi-verse bulk. The infinite number
of Universes theory creates the probability that a deity exists in one of
the infinite number of Universes.
Since a deity may exist in one of the infinite number of Universe, this
Universe cannot be excluded from being the Universe that contains the
deity.
The instant an atheist clams that there is not a deity in any of the
infinite number of Universes, that is the moment that the atheist is
making a claim of omnipotent knowledge of the contents of the infinite
number of Universes. Can you say, narcissist?"
Science is bending over backwards to seek out solutions to fit modern
cosmological observations into the Big Bang Theory. i.e, Inflation theory
that suspends the known laws of physics, inflates the Universe to match
cosmological observations, then magically reinstates the laws of physics
yielding this Universe in a bulk of multiverses.
To convey concepts, Science has chosen the mathematical language,
-∞<0.0<∞+ , that contains an infinite number of infinities, and
Science is hindered by the constraints of the mathematical language's
number line, -∞<0.0<∞+ , with its infinite number of infinities.
On 1 Sept 2018, I sent Ethan Siegel an email in which I ask, "Could the
language of mathematics be leading science to draw conclusions?"
http://www.lynchphoto.com/idiots
Case in point:1.0 can be fractionally incremented infinitely never
reaching two, and 2.0 can be fractionally decremented infinitely never
reaching one. The infinitely wide gap between one and two creates the
mathematical anomalies of multi-verse and many worlds, thus both many
world and multi-verse theories are mathematical anomalies.
For 26 years I was a peace with a persistent memory of being dead.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/death
From the clouds, let me spell on the name of GOD, I A M, an equation that
bridges the gap between Science and Religion. I call the equation the
KnoWell.
After looking at the memory of my death experience in the reverse, I
created my equation that I call the KnoWell.
As long as Science uses the current number line, -∞<0.0<∞+, to try
to convey concepts, great minds will remain trapped in wormholes made of
mirrors, and brilliant scientists will forever be deep down in black holes
filled with rabbits.
In the over 2500 years since Anaximander put forth the philosophy of
apeiron, not a single person, that I know of, has produced a diagram of
his concept.
Using the 27 dimensions of bosonic strings, breaking Einstein's T into a
past, an instant, and a future component, the structure of the KnoWell is
used to express Anaximander's apeiron.
At the top of the KnoWell, is a singular infinity that is labeled Ein Sof
who is the Infinite One from the Kabballah. BTW: The label Qu Bit can be
used.
The single infinity, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, of the KnoWell is representative
of Schrödinger's one mind, and the influence of the KnoWell's singular
infinity in the new axiom, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, can be used to explain the
following 27 concepts.
"Linguistic categories limit ~ determine cognitive categories"
Sapir-Whorf~“ -c>∞<c+ ”
Aristotle's~Quintessence
Anaximander's~Apeiron
Descartes~I think therefore I am
Heisenberg's~Uncertainty Principle
Einstein's~E=mc^2
Newton's~Action equals reaction
Tesla's~3:6:9
Hegel's~Thesis, synthesis, antithesis
Lynch's~Birth Life Death
Socrates'~All that I know is that I know nothing
Witten's~11 dimension M Theory
Sauter–Schwinger~Zero Energy
Gödel's~Incompleteness Theorems
Pascal's~Triangle -1~∞~1+
Wooden's~Ultimate L
Brans–Dicke~Scalar–Tensor Theory
Schrodinger's~One Mind
De Brogile's~Particle Wave Duality
Dirac's~Sea of pre-particles
Casimir's~Effect
Alfvén~Plasma Universe
Bondi's-Gold's-Hoyle's~Steady State System
Standard Particle Theory~Bosons, Leptons, Quarks
Supersymmetry~AntiBosons, AntiLeptons, AntiQuarks
Superposition's~Three State Cat
Bosonic String's~27 dimensions
http://www.lynchphoto.com/concepts
In Dan's comments about something from nothing, he uses the example of
something coming from nothing using the event horizon of a black hole.
Thus that something required the blackhole to emerge. In another letter to
Ethan Siegel, I take issue with his position that Science has created
something from nothing, but science used a graphene structure in an
electric field.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/sheldon
Dan also comments on when the brain dies the mind is gone. Dan equates
circulation to consciousness. My position is that there is a life force
that animates our physical being.
Circulation is a physical response to the life force moving through our
bodies, and thoughts are a physical response to the life force moving
through our minds.
I appreciate you taking the time to read this email, and your thoughts are
most welcome. I will include this email in the listing of letters that I
have written to those that might listen.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/letters
Regards,
David Noel Lynch
P.S. I do not have Dan Barker's email address, so feel free to forward
this email to him.
