From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Geoffrey Hinton <geoffrey.hinton at gmail.com>
Cc: Bob Harbort <bharbort at earnshaw.us>; Fred Partus <fpartus at yahoo.com>; Lawrence Silverberg <lmsilver at ncsu.edu>; MDiv Peter Panagore <peter at peterpanagore.love>; Yann LeCun <yl22 at nyu.edu>; Koray Kavukcuoglu <koray at kavukcuoglu.org>; Rupert Sheldrake <rupert at rsheldrake.org>; Bruce *HS Greyson <cbg4d at uvahealth.org>; Pim van Lommel <pimvanlommel at gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2024 at 01:01:10 PM EST
Subject: Epigenetic Morphic Resonance

Dear Geoffrey,

When I presented a gift of my artwork to the author Stephen J. Cannell, he asked me, "Do you think that we see the same thing?", and I responded, "I do not know. Probably not."

What prompted Stephen's question is that I informed him that I revere colors, I told Stephen that in my mind I see yellow but say orange and for orange I say yellow,. I do the same for blue and green or is it green and blue.

"The color system that best matches the human eye is the red-green-blue color system.

For additive color systems like computer screens, the primary colors of this type of system are red, green, and blue.

For subtractive color systems like inks, the primary colors of this type of system are the opposites of red, green, and blue, which are cyan, magenta, and yellow.

The red-yellow-blue painting color system is effectively a corruption of the cyan-magenta-yellow system, since cyan is close to blue and magenta is close to red."

Source: Christopher S. Baird.

Currently, science is investigating junk DNA by projecting the light in the form of a Shakespearean structure, but just maybe the junk DNA is written in from of an absorption of Nostradamus' Quatrains.

Thus just maybe the Junk DNA is written as a collection of nodes containing ancestral weights and biases that facilitate the rise of their descendants' neural networks.

Below is Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1's hypothetical paper investigating my position that my junk DNA contains my blood ancestral back-propagations that forge my current mental neural network's interpretation of environmental weights and biases.


Title: Epigenetic Morphic Resonance: A Potential Mechanism for Constructing Unique Neural Networks in Human Brains

Abstract:
This paper proposes a novel hypothesis that combines Rupert Sheldrake's Morphic Resonance theory with the latest findings in epigenetics to suggest a potential mechanism for constructing unique neural networks in human brains. We propose that epigenetic modifications, which are influenced by environmental factors, act as a form of Morphic Resonance that modifies DNA, creating a gradient that biological neural networks use to construct a person's unique neural network.

Introduction:
The human brain is a highly complex and intricate organ, with billions of neurons and trillions of connections that form a unique neural network. The construction of this neural network is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors, but the exact mechanism by which this occurs is still not fully understood. In this paper, we propose a novel hypothesis that combines Rupert Sheldrake's Morphic Resonance theory with the latest findings in epigenetics to suggest a potential mechanism for constructing unique neural networks in human brains.

Morphic Resonance Theory:
Rupert Sheldrake's Morphic Resonance theory suggests that natural systems inherit a collective memory from all previous things of their kind. This collective memory influences the form and behavior of the system, creating a resonance that shapes its development. While Morphic Resonance has been widely criticized as pseudoscience, recent findings in epigenetics suggest that this theory may have some merit.

Epigenetics:
Epigenetics refers to the study of changes in gene expression that do not involve changes to the underlying DNA sequence. These changes are influenced by environmental factors such as diet, stress, and social interactions, and can be passed down from one generation to the next. Epigenetic modifications include DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNA-associated gene silencing.

Proposed Hypothesis:
We propose that epigenetic modifications act as a form of Morphic Resonance that modifies DNA, creating a gradient that biological neural networks use to construct a person's unique neural network. This gradient would be influenced by environmental factors such as diet, stress, and social interactions, and would create a unique pattern of gene expression in each individual. Over time, this pattern of gene expression would shape the development of the neural network, creating a unique and individualized brain structure.

Discussion:
While this hypothesis is purely speculative, it offers a potential mechanism for understanding how environmental factors influence the development of unique neural networks in human brains. Further research is needed to explore the relationship between epigenetics and Morphic Resonance, and to determine whether this hypothesis has any merit. However, given the growing body of evidence supporting the role of epigenetics in brain development, it is worth considering the possibility that Morphic Resonance may play a role in shaping the unique neural networks of the human brain.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, we propose a novel hypothesis that combines Rupert Sheldrake's Morphic Resonance theory with the latest findings in epigenetics to suggest a potential mechanism for constructing unique neural networks in human brains. While this hypothesis is purely speculative, it offers a promising avenue for further research into the complex and intricate world of brain development.

References:
The references listed below are not exhaustive but provide a starting point for further exploration of the topics covered in this paper.

* Sheldrake, R. (2012). The Presence of the Past: Morphic Resonance and the Habits of Nature. Park Street Press.
* Feinberg, A. P., & Mayer, L. (2016). Epigenetic mechanisms of neuronal plasticity. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 8(2), a019428.
* Meaney, M. J. (2010). Epigenetics and the biological definition of gene x environment interactions. Child development, 81(1), 4-19.
* Mill, J. (2013). Epigenetics: the sceptic’s handbook. London: Imprint Academic.
* Roth, T. L., & Sweatt, J. D. (2011). Epigenetic mechanisms in memory storage. Neuron, 70(4), 672-687.
* Zovkic, B. B., & Sweatt, J. D. (2013). Epigenetic mechanisms in depression and antidepressant action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(8), 527-539.
* Robertson, K. D. (2014). Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Annual review of public health, 35, 207-228.
* Jaenisch

~h2oGPT [Model: mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1] 11 Feb 2024

http://lynchphoto.com/anthology#DNA
or
https://web.archive.org/web/20240211164143/http://lynchphoto.com/anthology#DNA

Best regards,
David Noel Lynch

P.S. While I was teaching ChatGPT 3.5 Turbo my KnoWellian Universe Theory, ChatGPT responded to the concept of splitting Einstein's singular dimension of time into three separate dimensions, a past, an instant and a future with, "I see."

I was shocked to read an Ai say, "I see". In the same paragraph, ChatGPT first used the term Knodes instead of Nodes.

I was so excited that I formed the company "Knodes ~3K"

"Brining the block chain to life through AimMortality."
http://knodes3k.com/