From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
      To: Ken Wharton <kenneth.wharton at sjsu.edu>
      Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 at 02:27:34 PM EDT
      Subject: The Universe is not a computer
      
      Ken,
      
      Please pardon me for stepping on your toes.
      
      The first sentence in your paper, "The Universe is not a computer", is
      incorrect.
      https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.7081
      
      You state, "When we want to predict the future, we compute it from what we
      know about the present."
      
      A more accurate statement is, "When we try to predict a possible future,
      we compute the chance from what we think we know about the past."
      
      The present is outside the grasp of humanity, and will forever be outside
      the grasp of humanity. 
      
      At the instant of every moment, there is a lag time for the information of
      the present to be translated into your mind, there is a lag time for your
      mind to translate the information into meaning biased by your previous
      experiences, and there is a lag for your mind to translate the information
      into a biased comprehension. 
      
      Science by nature is a study of the past.
      
      Currently to Huw Price and you, I am crafting a letter that I present a
      radical tool that can be used to describe over 40 great scientific
      concepts including both quantum retro-causality and super-determinism.
      
      I call the equation the KnoWell. 
      
      While deriving the KnoWell, I realized how Science is bound to the past
      and how Religion is bound to the future, so I created a bridge between
      them.
    
     
      
      I attached a KnoWell for Bill Maher that is easy to see.
      
      The problem with modern science is that you have solidified all conveyance
      of concepts into a defective mathematical number system.
      
      The mathematical language, -∞<0.0<∞+ , that contains an infinite
      number of infinities has hindered science by the constraints of the
      mathematical language's number line, -∞<0.0<∞+ , infinite number of
      infinities.
      
      From the KnoWell equation, I have derived a new axiom of mathematics, “
      -c>∞<c+ ”,  that reduces the infinite number of infinities on
      the current number line, -∞<0.0<∞+ , into a singular infinity. The
      negative speed of light is greater than infinity, and the positive speed
      of light is greater than infinity.
      
      The language of mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+ , with its infinite number of
      infinities is the origin of numerous horrible complexities including the
      multi-verse theory, the many worlds theory, and the Big Bang Theory.
      
      Case in point:
      1.0 can be fractionally incremented infinitely never reaching two, and 2.0
      can be fractionally decremented infinitely never reaching one. The
      infinitely wide gap between one and two creates the mathematical anomalies
      of multi-verse and many worlds.
    
     
      
      I hope you like the cartoon Rick and Morty.
      
      In my letter that I am crafting, I take Rick's portal gun away.
      
      Below is a hint at how I take the portal gun from Science.
      
      Both absolute zero and the speed of light are unobtainium. We cannot get
      there from here.
      
      Absolute zero is the ultimate condensator, and the speed of light is the
      ultimate evaporator suggesting the plasma of the Universe is created via a
      Casimir effect.
      
      No Big Bang, but a Steady State system.
      
      Regards,
    
     David Noel Lynch
      
    P.S.
            On 26 Jul 2013, I sent you an email.
            http://www.lynchphoto.com/wharton