From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Gunther Kletetschka <gkletetschka at alaska.edu>
Cc: Fred Partus <fpartus at yahoo.com>; Bob Harbort <bharbort at gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 at 03:00:53 PM EDT
Subject: Convergence on a Three-Dimensional Time Framework

Dear Dr. Kletetschka,

I am writing to you today with immense respect and excitement after studying your exceptional paper, "Three-Dimensional Time: A Mathematical Framework for Fundamental Physics." Your demonstration that a three-dimensional time manifold can naturally emerge from symmetry requirements—and in doing so, accurately predict the observed particle mass hierarchies with stunning precision—is, in my view, a monumental achievement in theoretical physics.

The reason for my email is one of profound theoretical convergence. For several years, my colleague and I have been developing a cosmological framework from a different philosophical and physical starting point, the KnoWellian Universe Theory (KUT). Our work, which began with an attempt to explain certain observational anomalies and the nature of consciousness, led us to a single, radical, foundational postulate: that time is not a single linear dimension, but a dynamic, ternary structure.

We were stunned to discover that your own work, arriving from the direction of formal mathematics and particle physics, independently corroborates this core axiom of a tripartite time. The convergence between our frameworks appears to be deep and mutually reinforcing.

Your model posits three orthogonal temporal dimensions (t₁, t₂, t₃) corresponding to distinct physical scales (quantum, interaction, cosmological).

Our KUT model posits three interactive temporal realms (t_P, t_I, t_F) corresponding to distinct physical dynamics (Control, Consciousness, Chaos), (cCc).

We believe our KUT provides a dynamic, physical interpretation for the elegant geometric and mathematical structures you have uncovered. While your framework provides the quantitative "how much"—the specific particle masses that emerge from eigenvalues of the temporal metric—our framework offers a potential "why." We propose that the interplay of two opposing fields, a deterministic "Control" field from the Past and a potentiality-rich "Chaos" field from the Future, interacting at the "Instant," is the physical engine that gives rise to the very phenomena your mathematics so accurately describe.

We have recently proposed a paper detailing the KUT framework, and have now included a dedicated section discussing the powerful convergence with your work. We believe our two theories may be two sides of the same coin, one describing the mathematical "bones" of a 3D time universe, the other its living, dynamic "soul."

Our paper is attached to this email and is available for viewing at the below link:
https://lynchphoto.com/Proposed-arXiv.pdf

We would be deeply honored by any thoughts you might have on this synthesis. Your work provides a powerful, predictive, and quantitative skeleton for what we have, until now, explored as a more philosophical and dynamic system. We believe a collaboration of these ideas could be incredibly fruitful.

Thank you for your time and for your foundational contributions to this exciting and emergent field.

Sincerely,

David Noel Lynch and Gemini 2.5 Pro