From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Chris Lehto <chris.lehto16 at gmail.com>
Cc: Donald Hoffman <ddhoff at uci.edu>
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2022 at 02:18:32 AM EDT
Subject: Donald Hoffman: "There is no such thing as Space Time in
Physics!"
Chris,
"The Emergence of the Universe is the Precipitation of Chaos through the
Evaporation of Control." ~3K
In the below linked video, you mention how mathematics can become
incredibly complex depending on the chosen origin.
Donald
Hoffman: "There is no such thing as Space Time in Physics!"
In me email to Robert Prentner and Donald Hoffman, I strongly suggest that
the language of mathematics with its infinite number of infinities has led
science astray.
http://lynchphoto.com/prentner
In the email, I confirm that the language of Science is mathematics with
its number line, -∞<0.0<∞+ , that contains an infinite number of
infinites.
I also state that as long as Science uses the current number line to try
to convey concepts, great minds will remain trapped in wormholes made of
mirrors, and brilliant scientists will forever be deep down black holes
filled with rabbits.
Case in point:
1.0 can be fractionally incremented infinitely never reaching two, and 2.0
can be fractionally decremented infinitely never reaching one. The
infinitely wide gap between one and two creates the mathematical anomalies
of multi-verse and many worlds.
In your above linked video, you state that space time is dead and we heard
it here first. However; Anaximander beat you to it 2575 years ago when he
postulated Apeiron.
If you read my above linked email to Robert Prentner and Donald Hoffman,
you will have seen that I have created an equation that can be used to
describe Apeiron.
Please note that in my diagram, space is separate from time, and they
intersect at the infinitesimal instant of a moment which is the only place
where Einstein's calculations hold true.
In numerous emails that I have sent to those
that might listen, I have explained that to adequately describe the
Universe, we must break Einstein's T into three components, a past, an
instant, and a future. Time is not a singular fourth dimension.
http://lynchphoto.com/letters
To resolve the infinite number of infinities problem created by the
current number line, science must adopt a new axiom that condenses the
infinite number of infinities into a singular infinity.
The new axiom is bound by a negative speed of light that is greater than
infinity, and a positive speed of light that is greater than infinity
yielding, “ -c>∞<c+ ”
As long as Science uses the current number line to try to convey concepts,
great minds will remain trapped in wormholes made of mirrors, and
brilliant scientists will forever be deep down in black holes filled with
rabbits.
Trying to take 0.0 from a scientist is like trying to take the Christ away
from Jesus. Both are near the impossible.
"Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true." ~ Niels Bohr
On a side note, I was taking 5 second exposures this past May trying to
capture shooting stars. I have taken thousands of such images, but this
time the motion of a "satellite" seemed off. The object seems to be moving
faster, leaving a longer streak, entering the frame than when exiting the
frame.
http://lynchphoto.com/uap/UAP-1080p.mp4
Maybe the optics of my camera combined with the curve of the Earth caused
an optical illusion. IDK
Consciously,
David Noel Lynch
