From: David
        Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
        To: Andrei Linde <alinde at stanford.edu>; Nathan Seiberg
        <seiberg at ias.edu>
        Cc: Patrick
          Draper <pdraper at illinois.edu>; Daniel Harlow <harlow at
          mit.edu>
        Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 08:41:14 PM EDT
        Subject: How the Physics of Nothing Underlies Everything
        
        Gentlemen, 
        
        In the below linked article,  the topic of nothing is discussed. 
        https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-the-physics-of-nothing-underlies-everything-20220809/
        
        What if the very language of mathematics has
        been leading Science down a rabbit hole filled with nothing?
        
        The language of mathematics has an infinite number of infinities
        that creates the illusion that inflation theory is correct.
        
        Simply said, 1.0 can be incremented infinitely never reaching two,
        and 2.0 can be decremented infinitely never reaching one.
        The infinitely wide gap between one and two creates
        the mathematical anomalies of multi-verse and many worlds.
        
        http://www.lynchphoto.com/maudlin
        
        However; using a new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”,
        that reduces the infinite number of infinities
        on the current number line into a singular infinity results in a steady
        state universe.
        
        This axiom of mathematics places the lower limit at the
        negative speed of light, the upper limit at the positive speed of light.
        
        
        Only at the infinitesimal of the instant of a moment does Einstein's
        E=mc^2 hold true.
        
        To fully describe the universe requires
        Einstein's T be broken into a Past, an Instant, and a Future component.
        
        In my letter to Fay Dowker,
        I explain how to use string theory's M branes to describe a steady state
        universe.
        http://www.lynchphoto.com/dowker
        
        Regards,
        David
        
        ----- Forwarded Message -----
      
      From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
        To: Patrick Draper <pdraper at illinois.edu>; Daniel Harlow
        <harlow at mit.edu>
        Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 08:06:16 PM EDT
        Subject: How the Physics of Nothing Underlies Everything
        
        Gentlemen,
        
        In the below linked article,  the topic of nothing is discussed. 
        https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-the-physics-of-nothing-underlies-everything-20220809/
        
        Over the past two decades,
        I have reached out to various scientific minds that might listen to my
        position.
        
        Simply said, the problem with Science is nothing.
        
        More specifically, the problem with Science is 0.0
        
        Actually,
        0.0 is Science's greatest mistake
        that is compounded by the
        infinite number of infinities
        on the mathematical number line. 
        
        I have created an equation
        that uses the logic of Lynch, the energy of Einstein,
        the force of Newton, and the sayings of Socrates
        to describe a moment of time as infinite. Called, the KnoWell. 
        
        The KnoWell uses a new axiom of mathematics,
        “ -c>∞<c+ ”,
        that reduces the infinite number of infinities
        on the mathematical number line,
        -∞<0.0<∞+,
        into a singular infinity.
        
        The influence of the KnoWell's singular infinity in the new axiom,
        “ -c>∞<c+ ”, can be used to explain the following 21 concepts.
        
        "Linguistic categories limit ~ determine cognitive categories"
        
        Anaximander's~Apeiron
        Schrodinger's~Three State Cat
        Einstein's~E=mc^2
        Descartes~I think therefore I am
        Newton's~Action equals reaction
        Hegel's~Thesis, synthesis, antithesis
        Lynch's~Birth Life Death
        Socrates'~All that I know is that I know nothing
        Witten's~11 dimension M Theory
        Standard Particle Theory~Bosons, Leptons, Quarks
        Supersymmetry~AntiBosons, AntiLeptons, AntiQuarks
        Bosonic String's~27 dimensions
        Dirac's~Sea of pre-particles
        Tesla's~3:6:9
        Casimir~Effect
        Gödel's~Incompleteness Theorems
        Pascal's~Triangle -1~∞~1+
        Wooden's~Ultimate L
        Heisenberg's~Uncertainty Principle
        Brans–Dicke~Scalar–Tensor Theory
        Sapir-Whorf~“ -c>∞<c+ ”
        
        In my below linked letter to Kristin Kobes Du Mez,
        I explain my position that the Universe is in a steady state not a Big
        Bang.
        http://www.lynchphoto.com/du-mez
        
        Because you most likely  will not open my weblink,
        attached is a graphic illustration of Anaximander's Aperion
        created from the KnoWell using Bosonic Strings
        to express how the universe in a steady state system.
        
        
        Sadly, science uses a defective mathematical number line
        with its infinite number of infinities and with its a glaring mistake of
        0.0
        
        Thus I must be speaking gibberish to your highly
        refined mind molded by the infinite number of infinities of the number
        line,
        and the grand mistake of using nothing to try and describe everything. 
        
        My website can be found on the way back machine internet archive.
        
        There you will find the below link that
        has links to numerous scientists that I have contacted. 
        http://www.lynchphoto.com/letters
        
        This letter will be included in the letters link.
        
        Your thoughts about nothing are more than welcome.
        
        Best regards,
        David Noel Lynch