From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>

To: Avi Loeb <aloeb at cfa.harvard.edu>
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2021, 12:13:07 AM EDT
Subject: Endless Creation Out of Nothing

Avi,

In the Scientific American article,

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/endless-creation-out-of-nothing/,

there is the paragraph that begins with, "If we feel the need to find emptiness,".

In that paragraph, quantum mechanics'
vacuum fluctuations are used to explain that emptiness
is not found outside of the volume of the Universe.

In an effort to explain how thermal radiation "pops"
out of the vacuum of space in any system with a causal horizon,
the article lists several effects that the leads to the vacuum ultimately seeding life through a Casimir effect.

Truly a quantum leap.

Now imagine for a moment,  that a scientist awakes from a stroke.
The world around them is totally new, and the scientist must learn the current facts surrounding the observed cosmos.

The scientist will rely on the references and teachers of that time to forge their theories,
and in this reality the scientist is taught a new axiom of mathematics “ -c>∞<c+ ”, that leads the scientist to the below Casimir effect.

"The Emergence of the Universe is the Precipitation of Chaos through the Evaporation of Control."~3K

In the article's example of two metal plates,
replace one metal plates with a boundary made from absolute Control,
and replace the other metal plate with a boundry made of pure Chaos.

The scientist is also taught an equation that uses the logic of Lynch,
the energy of Einstein, the force of Newton,
and the sayings of Socrates to describe a moment of time as infinite.
The equation is called the KnoWell.

http://lynchphoto.com/avignon

The Ein Sof point is the inflection point where the Casimir effect
brings forth the observable Universe through a Control brane and a Chaos brane exchanging place.

At the Ein Sof point, there is quantum exchange of Control and Chaos

that creates the friction that is documented as the 3 degree Kelvin background radiation.

Since web links are considered land mines this email will not include any links,
so below is a snippet from an email to Fay Dowker and Brian Cox.

"As letters can be arranged into words, numbers can be arranged into equations.
In doing so, both words and equations gain meaning.
From scientific peer reviews, equations gain meaning.
From these reviewed equations,
new concepts can be abstracted that will change the course of human knowledge.

Since the language chosen by science to convey concepts is mathematics,
any postulate must conform to the standard axioms of mathematics.
Using the most basic tool, -∞<0.0<∞+, the number line,
below is a verbal abstraction that will ultimately combine the two infinities
of the number line into one singular infinity.

This new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, explains how to get Grains from branes.
Using the analogy of a number line, place “brane a”, alpha, on the negative side,
and place “brane w”, omega, on the positive side.

As in Neil’s brane Worlds theory, collide the two branes. “brane a”,
with a velocity of the speed of light, moves in a positive direction, c+, and “brane w”,
with a velocity of the speed of light, moves in a negative direction, c-.
Each brane traverses the number line to the 0.0 point where “brane a” collides with “brane w”."

Thus the current language of mathematics that uses the axiom,  -∞<0.0<∞+,
expounds theories into an infinite number of infinities
giving rise to the mukti~verse / many~worlds theories.

http://lynchphoto.com/maudlin

By replacing the current mathematical axiom,  -∞<0.0<∞+, with the new axiom,  “ -c>∞<c+ ”,
the KnoWell equation strongly suggests that the universe is a steady state system.
That in fact a gigantic Casimir effect bound between Control and Chaos brings forth the emergence of the Universe.

Every scientist must have a stroke to understand that the Newtonian mathematical axiom,  -∞<0.0<∞+,
must give way the KnoWellian mathematical axiom,  “ -c>∞<c+ ”,
before the theories of the Universe can be adequately matched to the current observations.

http://lynchphoto.com/disney


0.0 is Science's greatest mistake.

Regards,

David Noel Lynch


P.S.

Below are some of the most recent individuals that I have reached out to via email.


Stephen Hawking, Desk  6 Dec 2006
...
Brian Greene, Greene   2 Jan, 2008
Alvin Plantinga, Plantinga  2 Jan 2008
Ronald L. Mallett, Mallett  11 Jan 2008
...
Fay Dowker, Dowker  4 Feb, 2010
...
Julian Barbour, Robertson  February 24, 2020
Larry M. Silverberg, Silverberg December 9, 2020
Larry M. Silverberg, Larry March 31, 2021 <- a response
Bruce Guthrie, Guthrie April 9, 2021
Lisa Yaszek, Yaszek 31 May 2021
Venkatraman Gopalan, Gopalan 6 June 2021
Alexander Franklin, Franklin 24 Jun 2021

Only a few have ever responded, and this email will be added to the list.
~3K