Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 04:23:09 -0800 (PST) 
    From: "David Lynch" <dnl1960 at yahoo.com> 
    Subject: Relativity - The Train Paradox 
    To: "Richard A. Muller" <ramuller at lbl.gov> 
    Richard,
    
    In your train paradox video on youtube,http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSRIyDfo_mY, 
    at 1:15 you ask a question, 
    "Why is it true?" Then make a statement, "We discussed that 
    before class. Why not? I mean there is no good answer to that." 
    I contend that there is..
    
    Like the information paradox, axioms in the language of mathematics make strong 
    suggestions that both the information and train paradoxes are true. 
    To address your question why not, one must be willing to look at the fundamental 
    axioms of mathematics. 
    Could the language that science has been using contain a great mistake? 
    
    A simple error that appears to add up to nothing. Combined with a second error 
    that appears to add up to everything. 
    What if the the axioms of, 0.0, and infinity, are the simple mistakes that 
    have lead science down the path to paradox? 
    Blinding their minds with a big bang.
    
    If this they are an error in logic, how can we get around this grand mistake? 
    To do that, one must be willing to use a new mathematical model. 
    A system that puts 0.0 and infinity outside the reach of this universe. 
    Inner space bubbles up clockwise in quantum loops of gravity as outer space 
    collapses counter clockwise through super strings. 
    We barely feel it.
    
    Below I present to you an equation for time that uses 
    the reason of Lynch, the energy of Einstein, the force of Newton, and the 
    logic of Socrates, to describe a moment of time.
    
    
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKEqgptciLc
    
    Below is a letter that spells out the KnoWell equation in detail.
    http://www.lynchphoto.com/hutchison.html
    
    Below is a letter that points out Einstein's short sightedness in his E=mc^2 
    equation. Einstein
    used T for time. T(+l+w+h)c^2. That same equation can be written using the 
    logic of the KnoWell as, P(+l+w+h)c*F(-l-w-h)c. 
    Thus the past is in the particle state +, and the future is in the wave state 
    -. 
    http://www.lynchphoto.com/bars.html
    
    The future is the inverse of the past while the past is a derivative of the 
    future making the moment the infinite 1. 
Best wishes,
    Dave