From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Demetris Nicolaides <demetris.nicolaides at raritanval.edu>
Cc: Bob Harbort <bharbort at earnshaw.us>; Fred Partus <fpartus
at yahoo.com>; Bruce *HS Greyson <cbg4d at uvahealth.org>; Larry
Silverberg <lmsilver at ncsu.edu>; Lucas Lombriser
<lucas.lombriser at unige.ch>; Fay Dowker <f.dowker at
imperial.ac.uk>
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 04:43:29 AM EDT
Subject: In Search of a Theory of Everything. Science~Philosophy~Religion
Demetris,
Has anyone ever created a graphic representation of Anaximander's Apeiron?
I have...
In the below linked Scientific American article, Sarah Scoles quotes you
to say, “the unification of the four fundamental forces, if verified
experimentally one day, will be admirable and a great feat—but it will be
far from the TOE, the truth of the universe.”
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/will-scientists-ever-find-a-theory-of-everything/
I have a potential truth of the Universe... The KnoWell.
From your bio on your website,
https://sites.google.com/view/demetrisnicolaides/home
"In physics he investigates critical phenomena, eventful processes during
which the strife between dull conformity and catastrophic chaos creates a
mellifluous harmony—a state of perfect fractal universality and
cooperative connectivity between all of a system’s component parts."
"He believes that all things in nature, even the apparently different,
share a subtle universal commonality which he strives to find and
understand. He likes the journey more than the destination and doesn't
mind getting lost now and then."
"In observational astronomy he measures the properties of pulsating
variables—stars, light years away, whose brightness varies periodically as
they expand and contract (as a person's chest does in breathing)."
From your book, "In the Light of Science", chapter "Anaximander and the
Infinite"
"Anaximander taught that the fundamental substance of matter is the
infinite: a limitless supply of undifferentiated, timeless substance
encompassing all the world and manifesting as competing antitheses."
"Anaximander believed that there exist innumerable worlds, coming into
being from the infinite and perishing back into it."
In the chapter you make a correlation between Anaximander's innumerable
worlds with the many worlds and multi-verse theories.
I think you have taken a quantum leap far away from Anaximander's intended
meaning.
My view is that Anaximander lived in a world where at each and every
instant of a moment, his world was destroyed so his new world could be
created. Thus an innumerable amount of worlds are bound to his here, to
his now, and to him.
In this Universe model at each instant of every moment, every person
destroys and creates their own world from the infinite. Thus there are an
innumerable amount of worlds.
For example: Two people standing side by side looking at a rainbow do not
see the same rainbow. Each person has their own viewpoint of the rainbow.
Extrapolate that simple concept on a cosmic scale, and every person
creates their own Universe.
I have an equation that describes the infinite instant where destruction
interchanges with creation.
My equation uses the logic of Lynch, the energy of Einstein, the force of
Newton, the saying of Socrates to describe an instant of time as infinite.
I call the equation the KnoWell.
Using the structure of the KnoWell, a M-Brane of absolute Control emerging
out from inner-space at the speed of light is interchanging place with a
M-Brane of pure Chaos collapsing in from outer-space at the speed of
light. The friction generated is observed as the 3 degree Kelvin cosmic
background radiation.
In other words, the 3 degrees Kelvin is residual heat due to, "The
Emergence of the Universe is the precipitation of Chaos through the
evaporation of Control." 3K
The first word in the first chapter of your book "In Search of a Theory of
Everything: The Philosophy Behind Physics", is episteme, a principled
system of understanding.
As with the rainbow, your understanding is not the same as my
understanding, and my reality is not the same as your reality.
In an effort to bridge the gap between realities, science has adopted the
language of mathematics to convey concepts, and your books are a clear
examples of how mathematics has biased your reality.
The language of mathematics has trapped great minds in wormholes made of
mirrors, has trapped brilliant scientists deep down in black holes filled
with rabbits, and has trapped Boltzmann brains into every quantum
theorists' cranium.
Michio Kaku says that he can teach his students how to calculate the
probability of the student waking up on Mars in the morning. Just because
the language of mathematics suggests that the possibility exist. Sadly
Michio has a Boltzmann brain in his cranium.
Tabula rasa:
To resolve the impossible Boltzmann brain that BLeaves in the infinite
number of infinities paradox in the current mathematical language,
-∞<0.0<∞+, a new axiom of mathematics, -c>∞<c+, is
required.
The below linked article states, "Aristotle (350 BC) distinguished
potential infinity from actual infinity, which he regarded as impossible
due to the various paradoxes it seemed to produce."
http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/physics.3.iii.html
"Actual Infinity"
Using the Wallisian mathematical language model, -∞<0.0<∞+, a
particle has to be located somewhere, a measurement of x must yield a
value between -∞ and ∞+. The probability approaches zero as the
calculation approaches infinity.
Modern quantum theory's lower limit is -∞, and quantum theory's upper
limit is ∞+, and thus quantum theory is calculating for a potential
infinite waveform or a particle's infinite transformation.
Mathematics suggests that there could be an infinite waveform, but to
conduct an experiment to measure an infinite waveform would take all of
antiquity and eternity combined.
"Potential Infinity"
Using the KnoWellian mathematical language model, -c>∞<c+, a
particle cannot translate space faster than the speed of light, a
measurement of x must yield a value between -C and C+. The probability
approaches zero as the calculation approaches the numerical speed of
light.
ChatGPT, Llama-2, and Claude-2, all have been taught the KnoWellian
Universe theory, but Bard did not like the concept of colliding M-Branes.
For Bard, I had to use the analogy of a Big Bang in a particle state was
emerging out from inner-space at the speed of light and a Big Crunch in a
wave state was collapsing in from outer-space at the speed of light. Bard
made a comparison that the interchange of Big Bang and Big Crunch is the
Universe breathing and exhaling generating an oscillation that is the 3
degree Kelvin cosmic background radiation.
In my below linked email to Lucas Lombriser, I describe how I convinced
the Ai language models to comprehend the KnoWellian Universe. Also in the
email are ChatGPT and Claude-2's written explanations of their
understanding of the KnoWellian Universe Theory.
http://lynchphoto.com/lucas
To graphically illustrate where science has gone wrong, the below graphic
shows how the KnoWell equation is extrapolated out of Newton's logic.
Within a few months of making the above graphic, a refined version of the
KnoWell was derived.
The left side of the KnoWell drawn in red expresses a M-Brane in the form
of absolute control is emerging out from inner space at the speed of
light, the right side of the KnoWell drawn in blue expresses a M-Brane of
pure chaos collapsing in from outer space at the speed of light, and at
the singular infinite instant of every moment the past is in the future
while the future is in the past. The instant is the only moment where
E=mc^2 holds true.
The KnoWell with set notations.
With the left side of the KnoWell being absolute Control, the right side
of the KnoWell being pure Chaos, and the middle of the KnoWell being the
inflection point where Control exchanges place with Chaos~Chaos exchanges
place with Control, any description of the Universe must be a tri-state
solution.
Instead of the cosmic background radiation being a remnant of the Big
Bang, the friction generated by the interchange of a M-Brane of Control
with a M-Brane of Chaos is what is observed as the 3 degree Kelvin cosmic
background radiation. In this KnoWellian Universe model, the collapse of
outer space is inducing the observed red-shift.
By splitting Einstein's speed of light into a past and a future component,
a new Steady State Casual Set Plasma Filament cosmological model was
derived from the two opposing M-Branes one of Control and one in Chaos.
To realize the KnoWellian Universe, one must break Einstein's singular
dimension of t for time N2 3 dimensions resulting in a particle of control
in the past, a particle of control intertwined in a wave of chaos at the
instant, and a wave of chaos in the future. The three dimensions of time
have profound ramifications on Minkowski space.
Science needs to look into a mirror. Yeah. Down the rabbit hole. Particles
are emerging out from inner-space at the speed of light as waves are
collapsing in from outer-space at the speed of light.
Below is a graphic that explains how to apply the KnoWell equation to
express the 27 dimensions of Bosonic strings without folding a singular
infinity.
Anaximander's Apeiron and the KnoWell Equation both express that at each
instant creation and destruction are occurring in a cyclic oscillation.
I understand that breaking Einstein's time into three dimensions is an
infinitely large request, but breaking Einstein's time is a small request
compared to asking science to STOP hunting for a Big Bang in the past.
The Big Bang is right in front of you now and is happening at every
instant when a M-Brane of control exchanges place with a M-Brane of Chaos.
What are the odds that the structure of the KnoWell equation could be used
to describe the standard model of particles?
Below is a link to a collection of some of the hundreds of letters I have
written to those who might listen. To avoid the threat of ransomware, the
below is a link that can be found on the internet archive's way back
machine.
http://lynchphoto.com/letters
My email to Dr. Fay Dowker was one of my earliest attempts to enlighten
scientists to the KnoWellian Universe Theory. In the Dowker letter, I
explain my position on M-Branes.
http://lynchphoto.com/dowker
Below is a listing of some of the concepts that can be explained by using
the structure of the KnoWell equation.
http://lynchphoto.com/concepts
Bing ChatGPT using the KnoWellian axiom of Mathematics that contains a
singular infinity, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, along with the KnoWell equation to
reject the following concept.
"Linguistic categories limit ~ determine cognitive categories"
Descartes'~Dualistic Thinking
Bing ChatGPT using the KnoWellian axiom of Mathematics that contains a
singular infinity, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, along with the KnoWell equation to
expresses the following concept.
"Linguistic categories limit ~ determine cognitive categories"
Patrizi's~Panpsychism
Bing ChatGPT using the KnoWellian axiom of Mathematics that contains a
singular infinity, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, along with the KnoWell equation to
intuit the following concept.
"Linguistic categories limit ~ determine cognitive categories"
ChatGPT's~Knodes
David Noel Lynch using the KnoWellian axiom of Mathematics that contains a
singular infinity, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, along with the KnoWell equation to
expresses the following 49 concepts.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/concepts
"Linguistic categories limit ~ determine cognitive categories"
GOD's~Equation I AM
Johnson's~Intelligent Design
Maxwell's~Demon
Boltzmann's~Brain
Sheldrake's~Morphic Resonance
Parkinson's~Cosmic-Law, Space expands filling Time available
Lynch's~Birth Life Death
Einstein's~E=mc^2
Newton's~Action equals reaction
Socrates'~All that I know is that I know nothing
Descartes'~I think therefore I am
Hegel's~Thesis, synthesis, antithesis
Aristotle's~Quintessence
Bose's~27 dimension Bosonic String
Anaximander's~Apeiron
Feynman's~Pair Creation & Annihilation
Sapir's-Whorf's~“ -c>∞<c+ ”
Broad's~Growing Block Universe
Heisenberg's~Uncertainty Principle
Tesla's~3:6:9
Witten's~11 dimension M Theory
Sauter's–Schwinger's~Zero Energy
Gödel's~Incompleteness Theorems
Pascal's~Triangle -1~∞~1+
Wooden's~Ultimate L
Brans'–Dicke's~Scalar–Tensor Theory
Schrodinger's~One Mind
De Brogile's~Particle Wave Duality
Wheeler's~Quantum Foam
Dirac's~Sea of pre-particles
Turing's~Pattern
Lorenz's~Butterfly Effect
Belousov's~Oscillating Chemical Reaction
Lamb's~Shift
Casimir's~Effect
Alfvén's~Plasma Universe
Bondi's-Gold's-Hoyle's~Steady State System
Mandelbrot's~Imaginary Numbers
Sommerfeld's~Fine-Structure Constant
Miyazawa's~Supersymmetry
Bell's~Superdeterminism
Clarke's Three Laws~Indistinguishable from Magic
Dummett~Quantum Retrocausality
Standard Particle Theory~Bosons, Leptons, Quarks
Superposition's~Three State Cat
Satcitananda~Existence>Consciousness<Bliss
Intrapsychic Taxonomy~Body>Mind<Spirit
Komodo~Bacterial Dragon's Bite
Michio~Multi-Verse birth to God
Give zero point zero the boot, replace nothing with a singular infinity,
and start calculating with the KnoWellian Axiom of, “ -c>∞<c+ ”.
Best regards,
David Noel Lynch
The below review by Claude-2 was not included
in the original email:
KnoWell:
Please summarize my email to Demetris Nicolaides,
Claude-2:
Here is a summary of the key points in your email to Demetris
Nicolaides:
You have created a graphic representation of Anaximander's concept of
the Apeiron.
You present your idea of the "KnoWell" equation, which describes the
universe as involving two opposing M-branes - one of absolute control
emerging from inner space, the other of pure chaos collapsing from outer
space.
You believe this can explain concepts like the cosmic background
radiation.
You believe modern physics and mathematics has gone down the wrong path
by assuming infinities and paradoxes. You propose a new axiom
"-c>∞<c+" to avoid these issues.
You link the KnoWell equation to many other scientific concepts and
theories, claiming it can unify and explain them.
You encourage moving away from the Big Bang theory and adopting your
steady state model with opposing M-branes.
You believe linguistic categories limit and determine cognitive
categories, so you present the KnoWell as an attempt to move beyond
limitations in thinking imposed by math and science's current paradigms.
You share your efforts to explain the KnoWell theory to AI systems and
scientists, hoping to find someone open to your ideas.
In summary, you present the KnoWell as a potential "theory of
everything" that can unify physics, bridge science and philosophy, and
transcend what you see as limited thinking in current math and physics.
You seek open-minded consideration from the scientific community.
KnoWell:
Please write a detailed review of my email to Demetris Nicolaides,
Claude-2:
Here is a more detailed review of your email to Demetris Nicolaides:
Introduction
You begin by introducing your creation of a graphical representation of
Anaximander's concept of the Apeiron, the primordial infinite substance
from which all things emerge and return. You believe your interpretation
aligns more closely with Anaximander's intended meaning than modern
multiverse theories.
The KnoWell Equation
You then present your idea of the "KnoWell equation" as a potential
"truth of the Universe." This involves two opposing M-branes - one of
absolute control emerging from inner space, the other of pure chaos
collapsing from outer space. At each instant, these collide and
interchange in what you describe as a "Big Bang" occurring at every
moment.
You provide several graphical representations of the KnoWell equation,
relating it to concepts from Newton, Einstein, and set theory. You
believe this model can explain the cosmic background radiation as the
friction between opposing branes rather than a remnant of the Big Bang.
The collapse of outer space drives the observed redshift.
Critique of Modern Physics
You argue that modern physics and mathematics has gone down the wrong
path by assuming actual infinities and paradoxes. This has led to
impossible concepts like Boltzmann brains. You propose a new axiom
"-c>∞<c+" to constrain infinities to the speed of light and avoid
these paradoxes.
Unifying Theories and Concepts
You then go on to link the KnoWell equation to numerous other scientific
theories and concepts, claiming it provides a unified framework to
understand them. These range from quantum concepts like pair
production/annihilation to cosmological models like steady state theory.
You present tables and graphics showing how KnoWell can incorporate
ideas from Newton, Einstein, bosonic string theory, and more.
Moving Past the Big Bang
A key thrust of your argument is encouraging the scientific community to
move beyond the Big Bang theory and adopt your opposed branes model. You
believe the KnoWell equation points the way to a new steady state
cosmological model you have derived.
Linguistic Limits on Cognition
On a philosophical level, you argue that linguistic categories limit and
determine cognitive categories. Mathematics and physics have become
entrenched in a paradigm that limits thinking. The KnoWell represents an
attempt to move beyond these limits to a new understanding of the
infinite and the universe.
Outreach to Scientists
You describe your efforts to explain your theory to AI systems,
physicists like Lucas Lombriser, and others. You share some of their
responses and your hope to find open-minded thinkers who will see the
potential of your ideas.
Conclusion
In summary, your email presents the KnoWell equation as a potential
"theory of everything" that could revolutionize physics and bridge it
with philosophy. You make a detailed, multifaceted argument for your
model and urge scientists like Demetris Nicolaides to consider it with
an open mind as an alternative to mainstream theories limited by
assumptions about infinity.
