From: David
Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Conrad Ranzan <ranzan at cellularuniverse.org>
Cc: Roger Ferragallo <trecate at comcast.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 03:35:14 AM EDT
Subject: A Steady State Universe is a finite system
Gentlemen,
Please pardon me for interrupting your day.
I skimmed the Large-Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe paper.
Over the past 20 years, I have been working on an equation that strongly suggests that the universe is in a steady state. I call my equation, the KnoWell.
Modern Science is filled with semantically misleading words like the Universe emerged from nothing, and black holes are infinite.
The language of mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+, with its infinite number of infinities has trapped great minds in wormholes made of mirrors and has trapped brilliant scientists deep down in black holes filled with rabbits.
Using my equation, I have derived a new axiom of mathematics that reduces the infinite number of infinities on the number line into a singular infinity, “ -c>∞<c+ ”.
Below is a graphic that on the left side expresses the current scientific Newtonian Einsteinian model where action equals reaction, and the right side shows a KnoWellian model derived by using my new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”.
To: Conrad Ranzan <ranzan at cellularuniverse.org>
Cc: Roger Ferragallo <trecate at comcast.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 03:35:14 AM EDT
Subject: A Steady State Universe is a finite system
Gentlemen,
Please pardon me for interrupting your day.
I skimmed the Large-Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe paper.
Over the past 20 years, I have been working on an equation that strongly suggests that the universe is in a steady state. I call my equation, the KnoWell.
Modern Science is filled with semantically misleading words like the Universe emerged from nothing, and black holes are infinite.
The language of mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+, with its infinite number of infinities has trapped great minds in wormholes made of mirrors and has trapped brilliant scientists deep down in black holes filled with rabbits.
Using my equation, I have derived a new axiom of mathematics that reduces the infinite number of infinities on the number line into a singular infinity, “ -c>∞<c+ ”.
Below is a graphic that on the left side expresses the current scientific Newtonian Einsteinian model where action equals reaction, and the right side shows a KnoWellian model derived by using my new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”.
To answer the
question raised in your paper, Where Does All The Expanded Space Go, I
refer you back 3000 years to Anaximander's Apeiron.
Anaximander held the position that the Apeiron is created at each instant only to immediately be destroyed in a constant cycle of creation and destruction.
Imagine for a second that "The Emergence of the Universe is the precipitation of Chaos through the evaporation of Control." ~3K
What if the universe is a Casimir effect between a M-Brane of absolute Control that is exchanging place with a M-Brane of pure Chaos yielding a plasma filament steady state system?
Under this model, the cosmic background radiation becomes a friction between the two M-Branes interchanging places. At each instant the Universe's expansion induces a corresponding contraction. Anaximander's Apeiron.
The expansion of space is a delusion due to the fact that Science does not consider the potential that outer space is collapsing.
In the KnoWellian model, the M-Brane of Absolute Control is observed as a particle, and the M-Brane of pure Chaos is observed as a wave.
Your paper is trying to squeeze a steady state system into a multi-verse mathematical language.
Anaximander held the position that the Apeiron is created at each instant only to immediately be destroyed in a constant cycle of creation and destruction.
Imagine for a second that "The Emergence of the Universe is the precipitation of Chaos through the evaporation of Control." ~3K
What if the universe is a Casimir effect between a M-Brane of absolute Control that is exchanging place with a M-Brane of pure Chaos yielding a plasma filament steady state system?
Under this model, the cosmic background radiation becomes a friction between the two M-Branes interchanging places. At each instant the Universe's expansion induces a corresponding contraction. Anaximander's Apeiron.
The expansion of space is a delusion due to the fact that Science does not consider the potential that outer space is collapsing.
In the KnoWellian model, the M-Brane of Absolute Control is observed as a particle, and the M-Brane of pure Chaos is observed as a wave.
Your paper is trying to squeeze a steady state system into a multi-verse mathematical language.
My axiom of
mathematics, "-c>∞<c+", reduces the infinite number of
infinities into a singular infinitesimally small infinity that is
bound between the negative speed of light and the positive speed of
light
Below is a KnoWell equation created for Peter Roman.
Below is a KnoWell equation created for Peter Roman.
By breaking
Einstein's T for time into three components, a past, an
instant, and a future, the KnoWell equation can be used to
express Anaximander's Apeiron.
Below is a
graphic representation of the structure of the KnoWell expressing the
standard particle model including super symmetry.
Below is a
graphic that expresses how Science has been looking at the Universe in
the reverse.
Below is the
artwork from which the KnoWell equation emerged.
Below is a
series of images that shows how I can use the structure of the KnoWell
to express the Steady State Universe on a bar napkin.
Who Am I?
"I am a particle."
"I am a Wave"
"I am all Antiquity."
"I am all Eternity."
"I am a Past"
"I am an Instant"
"I am a Future"
"I am a Fine-Structure Constant"
"I am Every Thing"
"I am No Thing"
"I am absolute Control"
"I am pure Chaos"
"I am the Negative one"
"I am the one Positive"
"Considering All Together, Who am I?
"I AM U."
I appreciate you taking the time to read my
ramblings.
Regards,
David Noel Lynch
Below is my above letter fed into ChatGPT.
Dear Conrad Ranzan and Roger Ferragallo,
I hope this email finds you well. My name is David Lynch, and I am writing to share some fascinating insights regarding the concept of a steady-state universe. I apologize for any interruption caused by this email, but I believe the information I have could be of significant interest to you.
Recently, I had the opportunity to peruse the "Large-Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe" paper. Drawing from my own research spanning the past two decades, I have developed an equation that strongly suggests the universe operates in a steady-state manner. I refer to this equation as the KnoWell.
In the realm of modern science, we often encounter semantically misleading terms such as the universe "emerging from nothing" or black holes being "infinite." It is my belief that the language of mathematics, with its multitude of infinities (-∞<0.0<∞+), has ensnared brilliant minds in a labyrinth of mirrors and confined them within black holes teeming with paradoxes.
Using the KnoWell equation, I have derived a new axiom in mathematics that condenses the infinite number of infinities along the number line into a singular infinity, represented as "-c>∞<c+."
To address the question raised in your paper, "Where Does All The Expanded Space Go?" I propose looking back 3000 years to Anaximander's Apeiron. Anaximander posited that the Apeiron is created and instantly destroyed in an unending cycle of creation and destruction.
Consider, for a moment, the notion that "The Emergence of the Universe is the precipitation of Chaos through the evaporation of Control". ~3K
What if the universe is akin to a Casimir effect between an M-Brane of absolute Control and an M-Brane of pure Chaos, resulting in a plasma filament steady-state system?
In this model, the cosmic background radiation manifests as a friction between the two M-Branes, perpetually interchanging positions. Each instance of the universe's expansion induces a corresponding contraction—an embodiment of Anaximander's Apeiron.
The illusion of space expansion arises due to science's failure to consider the potential collapse of outer space. Within the KnoWellian model, the M-Brane of Absolute Control is observed as a particle, while the M-Brane of pure Chaos is observed as a wave.
Your paper seeks to integrate a steady-state system into a mathematical language of multiverses. However, I believe my axiom of mathematics, "-c>∞<c+," offers a new perspective by condensing the infinite array of infinities into an infinitesimally small singularity bound between the negative and positive speeds of light.
I have included a KnoWell equation crafted for Peter Roman, breaking Einstein's "T" for time into three components: the past, the instant, and the future. Through this equation, Anaximander's Apeiron can be expressed.
Attached are graphics representing the structure of the KnoWell, depicting the standard particle model alongside super symmetry. Additionally, you will find artwork from which the KnoWell equation emerged, as well as a series of images illustrating how the structure of the KnoWell can be utilized to express the Steady State Universe on a bar napkin.
I sincerely hope these insights intrigue you, and I would be delighted to engage in further discussion or provide additional information as needed. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best regards,
David Lynch
Regards,
David Noel Lynch
Below is my above letter fed into ChatGPT.
Dear Conrad Ranzan and Roger Ferragallo,
I hope this email finds you well. My name is David Lynch, and I am writing to share some fascinating insights regarding the concept of a steady-state universe. I apologize for any interruption caused by this email, but I believe the information I have could be of significant interest to you.
Recently, I had the opportunity to peruse the "Large-Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe" paper. Drawing from my own research spanning the past two decades, I have developed an equation that strongly suggests the universe operates in a steady-state manner. I refer to this equation as the KnoWell.
In the realm of modern science, we often encounter semantically misleading terms such as the universe "emerging from nothing" or black holes being "infinite." It is my belief that the language of mathematics, with its multitude of infinities (-∞<0.0<∞+), has ensnared brilliant minds in a labyrinth of mirrors and confined them within black holes teeming with paradoxes.
Using the KnoWell equation, I have derived a new axiom in mathematics that condenses the infinite number of infinities along the number line into a singular infinity, represented as "-c>∞<c+."
To address the question raised in your paper, "Where Does All The Expanded Space Go?" I propose looking back 3000 years to Anaximander's Apeiron. Anaximander posited that the Apeiron is created and instantly destroyed in an unending cycle of creation and destruction.
Consider, for a moment, the notion that "The Emergence of the Universe is the precipitation of Chaos through the evaporation of Control". ~3K
What if the universe is akin to a Casimir effect between an M-Brane of absolute Control and an M-Brane of pure Chaos, resulting in a plasma filament steady-state system?
In this model, the cosmic background radiation manifests as a friction between the two M-Branes, perpetually interchanging positions. Each instance of the universe's expansion induces a corresponding contraction—an embodiment of Anaximander's Apeiron.
The illusion of space expansion arises due to science's failure to consider the potential collapse of outer space. Within the KnoWellian model, the M-Brane of Absolute Control is observed as a particle, while the M-Brane of pure Chaos is observed as a wave.
Your paper seeks to integrate a steady-state system into a mathematical language of multiverses. However, I believe my axiom of mathematics, "-c>∞<c+," offers a new perspective by condensing the infinite array of infinities into an infinitesimally small singularity bound between the negative and positive speeds of light.
I have included a KnoWell equation crafted for Peter Roman, breaking Einstein's "T" for time into three components: the past, the instant, and the future. Through this equation, Anaximander's Apeiron can be expressed.
Attached are graphics representing the structure of the KnoWell, depicting the standard particle model alongside super symmetry. Additionally, you will find artwork from which the KnoWell equation emerged, as well as a series of images illustrating how the structure of the KnoWell can be utilized to express the Steady State Universe on a bar napkin.
I sincerely hope these insights intrigue you, and I would be delighted to engage in further discussion or provide additional information as needed. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best regards,
David Lynch