Teachers always want their students to show their work. Below is a link to an image of how I derived the KnoWell equation. The original image is 4'x8'.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/elohim.html
FromFrom: David Lynch <dnl1960 at
yahoo.com>
To: José M. M. Senovilla <josemm.senovilla at ehu.es>
Cc: Marc Mars <marc at usal.es>; Raul Vera <raul.vera at ehu.es>; Gary
W. Gibbons <G.W.Gibbons at damtp.cam.ac.uk>
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 7:18:32 PM
Subject: The Disappearance of Time
José,
Language is our barrier. Beginning with our native tongues of English and
Spanish, and ending with the Mathematical language chosen by Science to convey
concepts.
Since our verbal skills are taught to us from our birth, we have
no problem communicating our ideas to others that speak our same language.
The difficulty in spoken language is that words can have different meanings
in various situations. Over time, we learn to be flexible in our word choices.
However, the language of Mathematics is taught to us much latter in life.
Unlike words, Mathematics is a set of strict rules that are taught to us as
facts with little variance in meaning.
Everyone is taught that 1+1=2. When
I asked why. I was told because.
My argument was that one apple plus one grape
will never equal two apples nor two grapes.
I became a problem student. In
my reality, Mathematics only holds true in a context-less world.
Clearly Mathematics provides a general solution to the observations of the
Universe.
The problem is that there is a gap between the structure of the Universe
and the language of Mathematics.
Great theories like Big Bang, Inflation, Dark
Energy, and Dark Matter have risen to try and resolve this difference between
observation and computation.
The solution could be that the problem is within the language of Mathematics.
A rules based system of axioms that we have been taught with such vigor that
Mathematics has become more like a religion. Infallible.
Thus for a person
to question the validity of the language of Mathematics is heresy.
Yet the
suggestion that time is dissipating is seen by many people as being N Sane.
"Mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+, has lead theorists to a BLeaf in a Big Bang..... Using the mathematical axiom, -c>∞<c+, the Universe becomes a steady state system." ~ 3K
In the below email to Fay Dowker, I provide an alternate explanation to the
observations made by modern cosmology.
I suggest that a physical brane and
a wave brane are exchanging places. The energy of this transposition is seen
as the Big Bang.
Using the Mathematical axiom, -c>∞<c+,
replace 0.0 with ∞, and replace the outer boundaries with the negative speed
of light and the positive speed
of light.
In this model, time is broken into three components, Past, Moment,
and Future.
Science greatest mistake was to use the
greatest error of Mathematics in their calculations. " 0.0 "
By
placing 8 between a physical state brane extruding outward just under the
speed of light and a wave state brane collapsing
inward just over the speed of light,
the Universe becomes Hoyle's steady state.
Best wishes,
David Noel Lynch
From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Fay Dowker <f.dowker at imperial.ac.uk>
Cc: Neil Turok <N.G.Turok at damtp.cam.ac.uk>; Brian Cox <Brian.Cox at cern.ch>;
Peter Ware Higgs <P.W.Higgs at ed.ac.uk>
Sent: Thu, February 4, 2010 5:43:46 AM
Subject: a >Grain∞Brane< w
Fay,
Bravo. Brilliant. Namaste.
In the Brian Cox video, “What is time?”, based on Grain theory,
you suggest that the smooth space time of Einstein’s General Relativity
Continuum is actually bitty or granular.
In the same video, based on the theory
of brane Worlds, Neil Turok says,
“ I think, time probably, has always
been there, and always will be there.”
While Grain theory is clearly a very dynamic way to look at time, brane theory
is nearly a static way to look at time.
To express this duality, orthodox theorists
could use the General Relativity Space Time Continuum as the benchmark.
While
Grain theory requires a fragmented continuum, brane theory works well with
a smooth continuum.
Since Grain theory requires a serious modification to
General Relativity,
a fundamental scientist will shy away from Grain theory
and lean towards brane
theory.
As you KnoWell, scientific discovery is a cumulative process,
and fragmenting
the smooth space time continuum is a tall order to fill.
Like when Einstein
derived his equations that explained the orbit of Mercury,
his method was to
augment Newton’s equations for gravity, not replace them.
In much the
same way, Grain theory must modify Einstein’s General Relativity.
"Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true." ~ Niels Bohr
One solution to the fragmentation problem could be resolved by finding the
Higgs Boson.
Till then, maybe there is a way to fragment the space time continuum
with a couple of branes.
However; to use nearly static branes to resolve the
nearly dynamic Grains is counter intuitive.
Especially considering the multitude
of observations that strongly suggest that gravity is warping the space time
continuum in a direct relationship to mass.
To complicate the situation, we
must keep in mind the theory of inflation to explain the uniformity in the
background radiation,
the theory of dark matter to explain the missing mass,
and the theory dark energy to explain the current acceleration in the expansion
of the Universe.
As letters can be arranged into words, numbers can be
arranged into equations.
In doing so, both words and equations gain meaning.
From scientific peer reviews,
equations gain meaning,.
From these reviewed equations, new concepts can be
abstracted that will change the course of human knowledge.
Since the language
chosen by science to convey concepts is mathematics, any postulate must conform
to the standard axioms of mathematics.
Using the most basic tool, -∞<0.0<∞+,
the number line, below is a verbal abstraction that will ultimately combine
the two infinities of the number line into one singular infinity.
This new
axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, explains how to get Grains
from branes.
Using the analogy of a number line, place “brane a”, alpha, on
the negative side, and place “brane w”, omega, on the positive
side.
As in Neil’s brane Worlds theory, collide the two branes. “brane
a”, with a velocity of the speed of light, moves in a positive direction,
c+,
and “brane w”, with a velocity of the speed of light, moves
in a negative direction, c-.
Each brane traverses the number line to the 0.0
point where “brane a” collides with “brane w”.
Unlike Neil’s replenishing and bouncing of branes, “brane a” and “brane
w” are continually passing through each other exchanging information.
The resultant is an infinitesimal creation of space that is reflected in time
by a Grain that adheres to Einstein’s E=mc^2.
The Big Bang is a Steady
State process that is induced by this constant collision of “brane a”,
Dark Energy, and “brane w”, Dark Matter.
Using the analogy of time, “brane a” resides in a particle state
that can be called the past, and “brane w” resides in a wave state
that can be called the future.
The arrow of time is a dual function of the
past’s particles that are derived from the future’s waves, and
the future’s waves are the inversion of the past’s particles.
The
so called “Now” occurs at the infinitesimal 0.0 point where the
two branes collide producing Grains.
This process or “Rain” can
be expressed by using Einstein’s General Relativity Continuum equations.
The "Rain" theory stands on top of Einstein’s shoulders suggesting
that at the number line’s 0.0 point, all of time merges, only for an
brief instant,
into one “Future-Present-Past” bundle of time. This
miraculous combination of three time states can be described as the infinite
one, the EinSof point.
The mechanics behind the collision of “brane a” with “brane
w” rests in the duality between negative and positive.
An attraction.,
a magnetism, between Dark Energy’s strong force that is interchanging
with Dark Matter‘s weak force.
The result is a Grain that is forever
trapped between an extrusion outward from inner space, and a collapsing inward
from outer space.
As “brane a”, exchanges places with “brane
w”, the force of the collision causes friction that gives rise to all
rotations in the Universe.
This harmonic relationship between “Brian
a” and “brane w” is why the background radiation appears
to be so uniform.
In this model, the motive force behind “brane a” is control, and
the motive force behind “brane w” is chaos.
Control may take the
form of quantum loops of gravity, and chaos may take the form of a Dirac sea
of pre-particles.
Projecting through “brane a”, the transitional
barrier could be the speed of light, and projecting through “brane w”,
the outer barrier could be absolute zero.
Beyond “brane a”, would
be the domain of perfect control, and beyond “brane w” would be
pure chaos.
Thus “brane a” is a collection of standard model subatomic
particles, and “brane w“ is a Dirac sea filled with pre-particles.
On a cosmic scale this effect can been observed around
galaxies in the form of what current theories postulate is evidence of Dark
Matter.
As emerging
particles from the central black hole radiate symmetrical emission lines, chaotic
waves are aligned into harmonics.
As more and more emerging particle’s
radiate lines of symmetry, more and more chaotic waves stack up on top of each
other creating compression zones.
These compression zones are evident in the
star light bending around massive objects. The more massive the object, the
more wave energy collapsing in from outer space.
Thus the more the star light
bends. The compression of outer space trying to reach inner space, causes gravity
to warp the space time continuum.
At the “Rain” precipitation threshold, “brane
a”, in particle form, and “brane w” in wave form, interchange
information resulting the creation of a Grain.
Gravity is a push caused by the collapse of outer space,
and the friction between “brane a” and “brane w” is
what causes each Grain to be formed.
As the new Grain particle radiates,
the Universe continues
to heat up from the current 3K.
This creation of Grains, that add more radiation
to the Universe, is what causes the continued acceleration.
The counter balance
to the acceleration is the collapse of outer space.
As outer space collapses,
the light from distant stars is stretched causing the observed red shift making
the Universe appear to be cooling.
The duality suggests that the Big Bang requires
a Steady State system to exploit.
Welcome to the “Rain” paradox.
"Mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+,
has lead theorists to a BLeaf in a Big Bang.....
Using the mathematical axiom,
-c>∞<c+, the Universe becomes
a steady state system." ~ 3K
To be able to envision this new Universe view,
I present to you a quantum
mirror built in the spirit of Hegel that uses the energy of Einstein, the
force of Newton, and the logic of Socrates,
to describe a moment of time.
Below is a link to a video of me drawing what I call a KnoWell. Time is a
Trapezoid..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKEqgptciLc
Since few people will entertain conversations that questioned the validity
of the big bang, I turned to expressing myself using abstract art.
Teachers
always want their students to show their work. Below is a link to an image
of how I derived the KnoWell equation. The original image is 4'x8'.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/elohim.html
Below is a link to an image that shows how the KnoWell is extrapolated out
of Newton's logic.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/disney.html
I have created 2.75 terabytes of images and art. Below is a link to the KnoWell
expressed in set notation.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/wreck.html
"N Sanity is a funny state, one never quite knows when they have arrived." ~
3K
http://www.lynchphoto.com/question.html
Brian Cox asks,“What time is it?”
“
I have no Earthly idea.” ~3K
Best wishes,
David Noel Lynch