To: Michio Kaku, Rodger Penrose, Sabine
Hossenfelder,
In response to the debate witnessed by me in
the below linked YouTube video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W39kfrxOSHg
The answer to the multi-verse question is simple, NO!
Out of a rabbit hole and into a nutshell, the problem is that Science has
chosen the language of mathematics to convey concepts, and the language of
mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+, contains an infinite number of
infinities.
The mathematical language nutshell problem is compounded by the fact that
zero point zero, 0.0, is Science's greatest mistake.
Since the universe is made of atoms, what can be nothing? "No Thing" can
be nothing.
The multi-verse theory is an artifact of the mathematical language that
contains an infinite number of infinities, and in turn Michio can
calculate his probability of waking up on Mars.
1.0 can be fractionally incremented infinitely never reaching two, and 2.0
can be fractionally decremented infinitely never reaching one.
The infinitely wide gap between one and two creates the mathematical
anomalies of multi-verse and many worlds, thus both many world and
multi-verse theories are mathematical anomalies.
The simple answer is to correct the mathematical language with a new axiom
of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, that reduces the number line's infinite
number of infinities into a singular infinity.
By limiting all calculations with the lower limit being the negative speed
of light and the upper limit being the speed of light positive, there is
not enough potential possibilities for anyone to ever go the sleep on
Earth one night and then wake up on Mars the next morning.
As long as Science uses the current mathematical languages' number line,
-∞<0.0<∞+, to try to convey concepts, great minds will remain
trapped in wormholes made of mirrors, brilliant scientists will forever be
deep down in black holes filled with rabbits, and Michio Kaku will forever
wake up on Mars.
Using the current mathematical language's infinite number of infinities it
can be calculated that Schrödinger's cat woke up on Mars a victim of
quantum suicide.
Case in point:
A scientist whom is an atheist is quick to BLeave that there are an
infinite number of universes in the multi-verse bulk.
The infinite number of Universes theory creates the probability that a
deity exists in one of the infinite number of Universes.
Since a deity may exist in one of the infinite number of Universe, this
Universe cannot be excluded from being the Universe that contains the
deity.
The instant an atheist clams that there is not a deity in any of the
infinite number of Universes, that is the moment that the atheist is
making a claim of omnipotent knowledge of the contents in the infinite
number of Universes.
"The Emergence of the Universe is the Precipitation of Chaos through the
Evaporation of Control." ~3K
