From: Pam Smart <p.e.smart at btinternet.com>
To: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
Cc: Rupert
Sheldrake <rsheldrake at clara.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 at 04:57:33 AM EDT
Subject: Re: Schrödinger's cat victim of quantum suicide
Dear David,
Thank you for your astonishing email which I will pass onto Rupert
Sheldrake for his reply. I hope you are well after your
accident. It sounds very unusual what you have experienced.
Best wishes Pam Smart (Researcher)
Would you like to receive Rupert Sheldrake's Free Online Newsletter? If
so, just click on the link below to get the application form. The only
piece of information we ask for is the email address at which you want to
receive the Newsletter. You can unsubscribe at any time.
http://www.sheldrake.org/Forms/newsletter.php
On 15 May 2012, at 21:54, David Lynch wrote:
Rupert,
Science embraces the interpretation that Schrödinger's cat is
simultaneously alive and dead, yet Science shuns individuals that have a
memory of being dead. If Schrödinger's cat can be both alive and dead, why
cannot a live human have the memory of being dead?
On June 19th 1977, I was involved in a serious auto accident that left me
with a profound memory of being dead. Below is a link to my most detailed
recollection.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/death
A few years my wreck, I became college trained in the Computer Science of
Artificial Intelligence. The more college indoctrinated me, the more the
world became a collection of data structures. My memory of being dead was
over shadowed by the logic of Science.
On April 1st 2003, my life took a turn that set me on a path to discovery
that continues to this day. Over the 2003 year, I searched for a
Scientific method to answer my questions regarding the memory of my death.
Then on Sept 16th 2003, I had a revelation that shredded my data structure
world view into pieces. No longer did my Scientific mind rest with the
memory of my death. I became compelled to find a solution to my world
view. On that night, I stumbled into abstract photography.
Over the next few months, I tried to explain to my family the depths of my
disturbance with Science, and I found that the problem in communicating my
position was founded in the language of Mathematics. The linear
progression of the number line, " -∞<0.0<∞+ ", blinds people with
simplistic binary logic. 1+1=2
So I started to ask people the question, "Since the Universe is made of
atoms, what can be nothing?" Most people smile. Some ask if I am trying to
trick them. A few quickly answer, "Nothing". Since no "thing" in the
Universe can be nothing, Mathematics has an error in the middle of the
number line.
During 2004, I used abstract photography as my work space, and I worked
out a solution to my world view that blends the birth and death states
into a state of life that traverses any given moment.
What emerged was a new axiom for Mathematics. " -c>∞<c+ " Using the
new axiom, the Universe becomes a Steady State system. Below is a letter
to Fay Dowker explaining how to apply the new axiom to cosmology.
"Mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+, has lead theorists to a BLeaf in a Big
Bang..... Using the mathematical axiom, -c>∞<c+, the Universe
becomes a steady state system." ~ 3K
I firmly agree with your position that there is a morphic field. Without
such a mechanism explaining the coin incidences in my life, I do not think
my equation would have ever risen out of the Scientific shadows cast in my
mind. Below is a link to the KnoWell equation that uses the energy of
Einstein, the force of Newton, and the logic of Socrates to describe a
moment of time.
Most recently, I have created a video that shows the evolution of my
artwork. Included is the art that I used to derive the KnoWell equation,
and a collection of signatures of those that have a KnoWell equation.
May the morphic field echo with Schrödinger's cat's quantum suicide. Maybe
then Science can get a grip on the mystery of the unknown in Religion, and
Science can come to terms with my memory of being dead. After all, reality
if only a figment of your imagination.
The KnoWell has the potential to bridge the gap between Science and
Religion.
"To crack the shell of Science, one must crush the mustard seed of
Religion." ~ 3K
Best wishes,
David Noel Lynch
