From: David Lynch <dnl1960 at yahoo.com>
To: Justin Brierley <unbelievable at premier.org.uk>
Cc: Blake Giunta <blake at beliefmap.org>; Stephen Woodford
<rationalityrulesyt at gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, October 7, 2022 at 08:20:35 PM EDT
Subject: The Kalam Cosmological Argument
Justin,
I just listened to the YouTube video,
Blake
Giunta VS Stephen Woodford on The Kalam Cosmological Argument (The
Unbelievable Show)
On 18 Jun 1977, like my father, I was an atheist that BLeaved that death
is a total lights out event.
On 19 Jun 1977, due to injuries received in a automobile accident, I was
left with the persistent memory of being dead. At that moment, I became
spiritual, but I did not become religious.
http://lynchphoto.com/death
The Kalam Cosmological Argument is an interesting binary concept to
ponder. Cause~Effect. However; the rational that Universe~God is an
enormous quantum leap.
Blake makes the point that the concept of infinity has a fatal flaw, that
infinity can never be reached by adding finite numbers to finite numbers.
Stephen makes an excellent point about the fallacy of composition, and
later points out that the composition of the Universe according to Brian
Greene is missing the BANG.
For example: to convey concepts nearly the entirety of all scientists use
the same language of mathematics, -∞<0.0<∞+ , with its infinite
number of infinities that traps great minds in wormholes composed of
mirrors, and that traps brilliant scientists deep down in black holes
composed of rabbits.
"The Emergence of the Universe is the Precipitation of Chaos through the
Evaporation of Control." ~3K
The above sentence describes an emergent Universe that is expressed by a
proportional relationship between control and chaos.
By augmenting the logic of the Kalam Cosmological Argument let Control be
the creation event that yields the God, and let Chaos be the destruction
event that yields the Devil.
If I would not of had my death experience, cause, I would never of created
an equation that describes how I was in a spirit state observing the
physical world, effect.
A scientist whom is an atheist is quick to BLeave that there are an
infinite number of universes in the multi-verse bulk. The infinite number
of Universes theory creates the probability that a deity exists in one of
the infinite number of Universes.
Since a deity may exist in one of the infinite number of Universe, this
Universe cannot be excluded from being the Universe that contains the
deity.
The instant an atheist clams that there is not a deity in any of the
infinite number of Universes, that is the moment that the atheist is
making a claim of omnipotent knowledge of the contents of the infinite
number of Universes.
Simply said, 1.0 can be incremented infinitely never reaching two, and 2.0
can be decremented infinitely never reaching one. The infinitely wide gap
between one and two creates the mathematical anomalies of multi-verse and
many worlds. See attached graphic Infinity-Never-Reaches.jpg
The language of mathematics has an infinite number of infinities that
creates the illusion that inflation theory is correct. Without inflation
the Big Bang Theory fails to describe the Universe.
In my letter to Fay Dowker, I explain how to use Witten's M-Brane theory
to describe how the Universe can be a M-Brane of Control exchanging place
with a M-Brane of Chaos. The interchange between Control and Chaos yields
the cosmic background radiation as a by product of the interchange. See
attached graphic KnoWellian-Universe.jpg
In numerous emails that I have sent to those that might listen, I have
explained that to adequately describe the Universe, we must break
Einstein's T into three components, a past, an instant, and a future. Time
is not a singular fourth dimension.
Letters Sent to Those That Might Listen
http://lynchphoto.com/letters
By using the new axiom which is bound by a negative speed of light that is
greater than infinity, and a positive speed of light that is greater than
infinity yields, “ -c>∞<c+ ” with a singular infinity providing a
simple solution to the horrible complexities of an infinite number of
infinities.
Using the new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, and the 27
dimensions of Bosonic string, I have placed an entire Steady State
Universe inside a trapezoid. See attached graphic 20220411_223806_w.jpg
Using the KnoWellian axiom of Mathematics that contains a singular
infinity, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, the KnoWell equation expresses the following
27 concepts
"Linguistic categories limit ~ determine cognitive categories"
Sapir-Whorf~“ -c>∞<c+ ”
Aristotle's~Quintessence
Anaximander's~Apeiron
Descartes~I think therefore I am
Heisenberg's~Uncertainty Principle
Einstein's~E=mc^2
Newton's~Action equals reaction
Tesla's~3:6:9
Hegel's~Thesis, synthesis, antithesis
Lynch's~Birth Life Death
Socrates'~All that I know is that I know nothing
Witten's~11 dimension M Theory
Sauter–Schwinger~Zero Energy
Gödel's~Incompleteness Theorems
Pascal's~Triangle -1~∞~1+
Wooden's~Ultimate L
Brans–Dicke~Scalar–Tensor Theory
Schrodinger's~One Mind
De Brogile's~Particle Wave Duality
Dirac's~Sea of pre-particles
Casimir's~Effect
Alfvén~Plasma Universe
Bondi's-Gold's-Hoyle's~Steady State System
Standard Particle Theory~Bosons, Leptons, Quarks
Supersymmetry~AntiBosons, AntiLeptons, AntiQuarks
Superposition's~Three State Cat
Bosonic String's~27 dimensions
http://lynchphoto.com/concepts
Recently I responded to Ethan Siegel's article that Science has produced
something from nothing.
http://lynchphoto.com/idiots
Yes, the link is named idiots.
The article states, "strong enough electric fields were created in a
simple laboratory setup leveraging the unique properties of graphene,
enabling the spontaneous creation of particle-antiparticle pairs from
nothing at all."
Ethan himself states that the emergence was from the unique properties of
graphene and a strong electric
field.
Thus the something did not emerge from nothing.
Clearly this email is UnBLeavable.
Big Bangers are just Flat Earthers with funding.
Regards,
David Noel Lynch