From: David Lynch <dnl1960 atyahoo.com>
To: Daniel J Clark <scimandan at gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 01:02:55 AM EDT
Subject: Young Sheldon

Dan,

In Young Sheldon season 6 episode 4, Sheldon comes to terms with the concept of nothing, 0.0

In a recent Big Think article, Ethan Siegel claims that science has created something from nothing.
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/something-from-nothing/

Upon reading the article, the something emerged from a graphene structure and a strong electric field. Science's greatest mistake is 0.0, i.e., nothing.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/idiots

A scientist whom is an atheist is quick to BLeave that there are an infinite number of universes in the multi-verse bulk. The infinite number of Universes theory creates the probability that a deity exists in one of the infinite number of Universes.

Since a deity may exist in one of the infinite number of Universe, this Universe cannot be excluded from being the Universe that contains the deity.

The instant an atheist clams that there is not a deity in any of the infinite number of Universes, that is the moment that the atheist is making a claim of omnipotent knowledge of the contents of the infinite number of Universes.

"The Emergence of the Universe is the Precipitation of Chaos through the Evaporation of Control." ~3K

Big Bangers are Flat Earthers with funding.

To convey concepts, Science has chosen the mathematical language, -∞<0.0<∞+ , that contains an infinite number of infinities, and Science is hindered by the constraints of the mathematical language's number line, -∞<0.0<∞+ , with its infinite number of infinities.

Case in point: 1.0 can be fractionally incremented infinitely never reaching two, and 2.0 can be fractionally decremented infinitely never reaching one. The infinitely wide gap between one and two creates the mathematical anomalies of multi-verse and many worlds, thus both many world and multi-verse theories are mathematical anomalies.

http://www.lynchphoto.com/maudlin

Clearly the GOD equation can never be derived by using the number line, -∞<0.0<∞+, with its infinite number of infinities, and anyone that thinks they can resolve the infinite number of infinites on the current number line, -∞<0.0<∞+, into a singular GOD equation will forever be chasing their tail. i.e., Michio Kaku.

As long as Science uses the current number line, -∞<0.0<∞+, with its infinite number of infinities to convey concepts, great minds will remain trapped in wormholes made of mirrors, and brilliant scientists will forever be trapped deep down in black holes filled with rabbits.

However: There is a solution to the infinite number of infinites problem. Science must adopt the usage of a new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, that reduces the infinite number of infinities into a singular infinity.

http://www.lynchphoto.com/avignon

Looking closely at the new axiom of mathematics, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, exposes a direct relationship to the Sauter–Schwinger effect. By propagating a Casimir effect over a vast scale the size of a Universe, our existence is due to a Steady State system that is exchanging a Witten's M-Brane of control with a Witten's M-Brane of chaos.

The friction generated by the exchange of a control M-Brane and a chaos M-Brane is what we observe as the cosmic background radiation.

As I detail in my email to Fay Dowker, this exchange of energies using Whitten's M-Branes, and I introduce the concept of the KnoWell equation.

http://www.lynchphoto.com/dowker

In the over 2500 years since Anaximander put forth the philosophy of apeiron, not a single person, that I know of, has produced a diagram of his concept.

Using the 27 dimensions of bosonic strings, breaking Einstein's T into a past, an instant, and a future component, the structure of the KnoWell is used to express Anaximander's apeiron.

http://www.lynchphoto.com/apeiron

The single infinity, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, of the KnoWell is representative of Schrödinger's one mind, and the influence of the KnoWell's singular infinity in the new axiom, “ -c>∞<c+ ”, can be used to explain the following 28 concepts.

"Linguistic categories limit ~ determine cognitive categories"

Sapir-Whorf~“ -c>∞<c+ ”
Aristotle's~Quintessence
Anaximander's~Apeiron
Descartes~I think therefore I am
Heisenberg's~Uncertainty Principle
Einstein's~E=mc^2
Newton's~Action equals reaction
Tesla's~3:6:9
Hegel's~Thesis, synthesis, antithesis
Lynch's~Birth Life Death
Socrates'~All that I know is that I know nothing
Witten's~11 dimension M Theory
Sauter–Schwinger~Zero Energy
Gödel's~Incompleteness Theorems
Pascal's~Triangle -1~∞~1+
Wooden's~Ultimate L
Brans–Dicke~Scalar–Tensor Theory
Schrodinger's~One Mind
De Brogile's~Particle Wave Duality
Dirac's~Sea of pre-particles
Casimir's~Effect
Alfvén~Plasma Universe
Bondi's-Gold's-Hoyle's~Steady State System
Standard Particle Theory~Bosons, Leptons, Quarks
Supersymmetry~AntiBosons, AntiLeptons, AntiQuarks
Superposition's~Three State Cat
Bosonic String's~27 dimensions
GOD Equation~I AM
http://www.lynchphoto.com/concepts

I appreciate you taking the time to read this email, and your thoughts are most welcome. I will include this email in the listing of letters that I have written to those that might listen.
http://www.lynchphoto.com/letters

Regards,
David Noel Lynch